Did Oswald get picked up or not?

*The official version is that he took both bus and taxi to get to his location, and was not picked up by anyone.

**Shown is various segments with Police Chief Jesse Curry. He mentions hearing Oswald was picked up by a negro. Also Roger Craigs account of him being in the inner office of Captain Fritz. Which was denied by Fritz himself.

How could Fritz dismiss what Craig said, because 'it didnt fit what we knew to be true'? How could Fritz know what was true right after the assassination?

WCR Vol.IV,245:

Mr. Fritz: One deputy sheriff who started to talk to me but he was telling me some things that I knew wouldn't help us and I didn't talk to him but someone else took an affidavit from him. His story that he was telling didn't fit with what we knew to be true.
-------
MR. Ball: Did that man ever come into your office and talk to you in the presence of Oswald?

Mr. Fritz: In the presence of Oswald?

Mr. Ball: Yes.

Mr. Fritz: No, sir; I am sure he did not. I believe that man did come to my office in that little hallway, you know outside my office, and I believe I stepped outside the door and talked to him for a minute and I let someone else take an affidavit from him.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• JFK
• John
• Kennedy
• assassination
• Will
• Fritz
• Roger
• Craig
• Lee
• Harvey
• Oswald
• elm
• dealey
• plaza
• dallas
• jesse
• curry

[Tomaji69]

@basenjib123 - I think once Oswald knew he was a patsy instead of an intel hero who would get a promotion, he knew he couldn't trust ANYONE at this point. So, the tail end of his "escape from TSBD", etc. is true...he went to his room, got his pistol & had NO idea what the hell to do. When Tippit confronted him, he offed him because Oswald figured HE would be OFFED by the planners so he wouldn't talk. In fact, I think he was supposed to be offed AT the TSBD, but he slipped out.

[Tomaji69]

@pajasa62 - OK, so how did Ozzie fire two shots bang-bang (the last two shots were almost on top of each other, like the SS agents said) AND how do you explain the BACK of JFK's head being blown out, yet the WC saying otherwise? It's an obvious plot to put LBJ in place of JFK, because JFK's "direction" was too liberal & he was for the American people instead of the 1% & the war hawks. JFK was viewed as a loose cannon "commie sympathizer" or such. He was ending the FED too!

[truesh1t]

@LoneNutter1 No problem, your very welcome and it was a pleasure.

[LoneNutter1]

@truesh1t When I first saw the Z-film I thought the same thing you did. The wound looked like the shot came from the front or side. But a total of 12 forensic pathologists who either performed the autopsy of reviewed the autopsy records, photos, X-rays, ballistic, physical and medical evidence said he was struck two times from above and behind and no shots struck him from the front or side. Thanks very much for being courteous about things. It's greatly appreciated.

[truesh1t]

@truesh1t I just have an extremely difficult time trying to grasp the fact that, with such a large, gaping frontal wound, not even a bit of force caused him to be pushed forward.

[truesh1t]

@LoneNutter1 Indeed, I will strongly take into account your input because your facts are more grounded than mine.

[LoneNutter1]

@truesh1t Bullets do not transfer their energy to the target therefore a bullet will not push the target in the same direction that the bullet is traveling. Bullets are designed to penetrate the target. JFK wasn't wearing a seat belt.

Your knowledge appears to based on the pro-conspiracy material that's been circulating for nearly 50 years. This material has differing theories about the motive, means and cover-up of the assassination. All of them cannot be correct simultaneously.

[truesh1t]

@LoneNutter1 And i have no idea out of all your pro-conspiracy advocate list of gunman because, my friend, you're talking to somebody who basically stumbled upon these video's out of pure interest, with some knowledge on the subject just to voice his opinion.

[truesh1t]

@LoneNutter1 Ok, great, then LHO shot and killed JFK. I have my opinion and you have yours.

If you put a pumpkin on a pedestal and shot it, is it going to go forward or backwards? it's going to run in the same direction that the bullets traveling. Why did JFK not slouch completely forward on the fatal shot? One could say his seat belt was holding him back but who wears a seat belt during a 20mph (idk the speed at the time) motorcade? He should have been completely up against the rear pas seat

[LoneNutter1]

@truesh1t So which one of all the gunman that have been created by the pro-conspiracy advocates shot the president?

[LoneNutter1]

@truesh1t There's not a single forensic pathologist who says JFK was shot from the front. All 12 of them, including the 9 pathologists for the HSCA, said there was no evidence JFK was shot from the front. He was struck twice from above and behind. There is no medical, ballistic, forensic or physical evidence to support shots than any other direction than above and behind.

[truesh1t]

@LoneNutter1 As far as LHO, he was given an order from some "official", agent, overseas agent, WHO KNOWS, to take out the president for a reward / lump sump etc... I believe the communication was superior in this instance, (between the gunman, not LHO) in that, they took out the president before oswald had a chance to. Oswald would be screaming bloody murder that he was set up etc... but he didn't, how can you? Which makes me believe he was set up, allowing specialists to assassinate w/out error