Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Freedom of Speech? Wilders, Ahmed and The House Of Lords.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
984 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 2, 2009

This is a short video I've made in response to the growing influence of Ideological pressure groups in our public and political affairs. It is unforgivable the government is willing to choose appeasement over honest politcal debate, and it is not something I take lightly.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (schmatt13)

  • The movie FITNA was made to misrepresent Islam by quoting half of Qur'anic verses out of context.

    These verses of Qur'an were revealed at the time of war and every verse that enjoins the believers to fight is followed soon by the verse that enjoins peacemaking.

    So the believer is asked to keep in mind for peace while he is fighting against oppression.

    Geert Wilders cut off the peacemaking part of the verse and introduced loud music to make good part of the speech of scholar inaudible !

  • And I'm sure those well versed in the Qur'an would have been given the opportunity to explain the fallacies in Mr Wilder's logic to him, had he not been refused entry to the UK. I'm not defending Geert Wilder's position, I'm defending his freedom to hold and/or express an opinion, just or otherwise.

  • Swing and a miss....

Top Comments

  • Who is this "Lord" Ahmed anyway? Who gave him the power to do what he did?

    It is time to get rid of the "House of Lords" altogether as well as Emir Charles and the rest of this feudal baggage&celebrity scum.

    A constitution with a "first amendment" like in the US block all those who scream for censorship and guarantee Free Speech.

    I'd call it Lex John Stuart Mill.

  • could this even be

    Sedition. illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority and tending to cause the disruption of the government

    ie. threatening to prevent an invited person, and lawful exhibition of a film and important debate of interest to some in the the house, and mobilising a 10000 strong mob to do so in the process

    using islam's proven violent reputation as the threat.

    if so GOOD we would just see even more of their violent ideology

    exactly like in the film

Video Responses

This video is a response to Islam Controls the House of Lords?
see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very well written. Make more spoken videos!

  • @condellwatch Pathetic.

  • Muslims are not supposed to listen abuse about islam and Allah unless they have enough knowledge to defend

    Most of the muslims learn the faith just for the sake of practice , not to debate ;the debate is supposed to be undertaken by scholars and I will send you video responses of muslim scholars Insha-Allah

  • pe

    no the fitna did tell the truth abt islam and that's why is was banned by muslims if not then why not have a debat over the movie

  • In fact wilders never goes in debate with true moslims., hes just hate the ones without jobs, etc

  • Hey, they even banned Michael Savage a DJ from America also.

  • Thats it im voting bnp. hopefully they wont be bullied like this its criminal!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more