Jim DeMint endorses Marco Rubio for Senate

Listen I support small government and business. I think all business should have a shot. And most of the time it does. You just need to prevent companies from making it so new guys can't in. I'm just for freedom man.

Listen I support democracy in the work place, a collective work place. A place where everyone is educated so everyone in the businesses has a say. In these kinds of businesses new technology will flourish, more so than that of the more fascist run companies that plague the country right now. There is no freedom in Capitalism, merely the illusion of it.

Freedom and new technologies can only exist with Capitalism. Under Socialism government leaders control everything. Meaning that they just do what makes us happy right now and don't look down the road. In business they make deals that will make there company successful long after they die. Also if you did what most Socialist want and have a wage limit. Than what you'll is no one making new technologies,because there will be no motive to.Capitalism has it's holes,but government makes them bigger.

You couldn't be more wrong. The anti socialism campaign is being led by the bourgeoisie themselves. People like Glenn Beck are instilling lies into your minds. Socialist do not want a wage limit. I think you a referring to the CEO's of AIG. Government intervention patches the holes, then they re-open. Socialism always looks down the road, as it for the people, by the people. The people are interested in the best interest of the people not profits.

A socialist government is government involved in free markets which I'm against. The real thing I'm against about Socialism is that it's run by and for the people. The goal is to please the majority and that's wrong,because the rich who work hard are the minority. So it encourages raising taxes on the rich and giving more to welfare programs. That's not a Constitutional government,because the Constitution really only allows the Fed to be involved in military,immigration,and trade. It's wrong.

The rich are not there, the rich do not necessarily work harder than the other people. Tell me how hard George Bush worked in his life? Being born into a reasonable amount of wealth allows you to create more wealth. If someone can't afford education, the are forced to work low paying mass production jobs. In Socialism we work together to come up with knew ideas and split the profits equally, but we also share the labor involved in creating the profits.

The Constitution gives the government the right to protect the general welfare of the people. If the current economic system does not protect the general welfare of the people, than it is unconstitutional. Letting a large majority, leave in poverty, is unconstitutional.

Well first off you must know that James Madison later clarified on that. He said it was the worst most regret able thing written in the Constitution,because it was a complete misunderstanding. Also you have to look at what promote means. Promote means to encourage. So government should encourage people to give,but not give. Also if you want to talk about general welfare. You'll find that nobody is to be treated in an inhumane way. That doesn't mean poverty it means something like Genocide.

...... go on......

Well they really did nothing to define general welfare. So I could say it's not fair every kid doesn't have and Xbox so we have to give them money,because that's the general welfare. Also you have to go back to what I said about promote. And what that means is to encourage people to give. So really it means government should enforce good moral principle. Your really have to examine those words. How one of the men who wrote those words went against them and than see.