Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

the man who was never born part one

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
81,306
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 21, 2007

the man who was never born part one

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @hypnoboy3 yeah the old classics are timeless,the current crop of tv is garbage,,give me this 60s show anytime,,,

  • @JamesonBondy Dancing with the Stars & Survivor ??? Is this your selection of quality TV? A decade or two down the road these shows will be swept into the dustbin of history...& those individuals who admitted to watching these "shows" will have to keep quiet so as not to be harassed & looked onto with derision. OL however will survive well past the point where your "favorites" are long gone & forgotten.

see all

All Comments (187)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I saw this episode for the first time today. Thought it was like Beauty And The Beast, when the bride to never be decided she loved the hideous mutant who tried to look handsome.

  • great TV from the past; today's offerings are nothing but moron fodder.

  • TV excelcior 1962 Show...Outer Limits ...in Brazil.////

  • 2148???!!! Holy Crap!!! See what Gmo's, Obama, NDAA, the Patriot Act, DWTS, the National Football League, Lady GaGa, Glenn Beck, Fu-ca-she-ma Fall-out, Cartoon Network, Chevy's Volt, W., Thin Lizzie, Lisa Lampanelli, BB Netenyahoo, TROLOLOL, Alex Jones, Support the Troops magnets, Justin Bieber, Directed Energy Weapons, Anderson Cooper, tats, Public School, Top Gear, Rod Blagoyovich, TARP, the movie DRIVE, Bill O'Lilley, Newt Gringrich, Ol' Scratch, Jerry Seinfeld and MF Global will render?

  • @SuperZenozeno Thanks. IMO today's shows and movies focus way too much on special effects, CGI, thrills, and model-turned-actor types who indeed look great, but couldn't act to save their lives. All that eye candy becomes blasé very quickly. Like you say back in the 60's, budget were very tight. A lot of the time all show creators and producers had to work with was the story, the acting, a few props and makeup. So, they had to focus on making those things great. It's a lesson for today.

  • This show reminds me of the astronaut that came back to earth to only find out that, NOW BRACE YOURSELVES I DON'T WANT ANY YT VIEWERS TO PANIC, Ok, Ahum WHAT THE BIO CHEMIST DID BACK IN OUR TIME FRAME @ Ahum, "MONSANTO" did to the worlds food crops that lead to HUMAN civilizations demize, now how profetic can that be. ; ) =-O : X

  • @dewfall56

    Bingo, your are so spot on with this, the OL's of the 60's was a verry thought provoking, profetic even, example "OBIT", "I ROBOT" & THE MAN WHO WAS NEVER BORN, & since the early to mid 60's look @ the advancements in computer tech, robotics, lasers ect that this show eriely portrayed w/ its other worldly deminsional creatures added into the mix for Excitment, I can thk of no modern day Sci/Fi show on 2days budgets can do what Stevens & Stafano did back then on a shoestring budget.

  • @dewfall56 hey! i resemble that remark! :D seriously, i agree 200%. this laid the foundations for the Star Trek cycle. Dare I say it? Even the Outer Limits reboot of the 1980's fell short. alas. the collective frontal lobe of the viewership has atrophied

  • how cerebral. how mannerly.how bleak.

  • @robharding1957 I agree with you. Up sixties!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more