Fresh Evidence - 911 was a Controlled Demolition

To watch the full video for free, visit bigsmallvillage.com/videos.php

Professor Steven Jones' groundbreaking presentation at the Rebuilding America's Senses event at the University of Texas. During the talk, Jones unveils compelling new evidence that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that artificial explosives were used to implode the twin towers on 9/11.

Jones laid out facts about steel samples recovered from the WTC site that Popular Mechanics dare not even attempt to debate. Debunkers are scared to even get near this information because the science behind it fundamentally contradicts the official story of what happened on 9/11. The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• conspiracy
• controlled
• demolition
• twin
• towers
• new
• york
• terrorism

[BigSmallVillage]

This is worth taking a look at -

w w w.serendipity . li/wot/aa11 . html

[BigSmallVillage]

The Illuminati refer to the Earth's population as 'the ignorant masses'.

[taoaman1]

There is absolutely NOTHING in science that can explain the scale, speed & symmetry of the collapse of the wtc towers on 9/11 other than the intervention of EXPLOSIVES!!

Nobody can replicate wtc tower collapse using fire. Instead, U have all manner of agencies, scholars even universities proffering theories & guestimates about the mechanism of structural failure

No matter how hard they try, the laws of physics cannot be overturned by this administration or anybody else. You CANNOT prove a LIE!

[jetplane2006]

GOD BLESS all true american patriots.

[amishnation]

@WellWTF1 Every step of the way has been the same as with the war that followed. Denial about having intel or true nature of intel, then people coming forward saying they were giving specific intel for months beforehand but being deliberately ignored. Then gov grudgingly- admits that yes, maybe they did know a little something about what was going to happen. At least enough to increase security at the airports everywhere and keep fighters ready. The tech aspect will follow pattern.

[tropicbum62]

IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THOSE WHO REALLY KNEW TECHNICALLY THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE WERE SILENCED AND WERE AFRAID OF THE POWER OF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DECEPTION. ITS UNFORTUNATE THAT SO MANY OF OUR CITIZENS ARE SO FAR GONE MENTALLY THAT THE POWER PEOPLE HAD FIGURED FOR THAT AND KNEW THEY COULD PULL IT OFF

[russkeller]

@taoaman1 I'm a member of AE911 truth I tend to not make a lot of friends proving that towers 1&2 did NOT fall at free fall and I can do it without math and using observation skills alone. Watch the debris falling outside of Towers 1 & 2, The debris is falling faster than the collapse ergo no freefall in towers 1&2 That kind of crap only drives away people who would approach this logically and methodically to Building 7, the explosions, the breaking of basic investigative procedures ect

[karioka2]

@taoaman1 wait,,.. only lawyers can prove lies lol

[CRELLIOTT0302]

THE TRUTH SHALL STAND THE TESTS OF TIME AND LIES WILL SOON BE FIGURED OUT.

[DrLoonatic]

@taoaman1 "There is absolutely NOTHING in science that can explain the scale, speed & symmetry of the collapse of the wtc towers on 9/11 other than the intervention of EXPLOSIVES!!"

Pure ignorance at its finest. Learn science before you cite it to support your claims. Stop following Alex Jones like a "sheeple" (an accusation you throw wildly at anyone who can think for himself).

[marhoekful]

you guys gotta plaster these videos all over facebook

[bmw200000]

@WellWTF1 Are you on crack homie ?

[WellWTF1]

@taoaman1 I guarantee that you've never even read through a basic physics book, let alone knowing the laws of physics enough to analyze a collapse as complex as the WTC. You only know what YouTube videos and conspiracy web sites tell you. You're just as much of a sheep as the "non-believers who watch Fox News". And by the way, many physicists, civil engineers, and structural engineers support the official version. Google it, or even better, e-mail one of them, but most of all, get over yourself.