The True Mitt Romney; The Record on Taxes and Huawei

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
768 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 25, 2008

Mitt Romney answers tough questions from Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday, but the facts prove to be a tough obstacle to overcome.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (DavidDLPE)

  • Nice vid. Keep up the good work of informing people about this phony.

  • One phony down, one to go. Romney is out.

    Now that it is down to McCain and a real Conservative in Huckabee, maybe the tide will finally turn to get rid of this phony, McCain.

  • Great video David, I can't believe how many American's are being bought by this guy and not seeing through him.... it's sickening... His record on taxes/economy are bad, he moved jobs overseas and laid off a lot of people... and he's only conservative when it will help him gain votes, he's flipped on virtually every issue.

  • Thanks for the encouragement. The biggest thing to me is the Huawei/Bain partnership to take over 3Com. I cannot believe the national media is not reporting on this! Could it be that they are saving it to use against him in the general should he be the nominee?

  • I just found out some new information on this:

    According to BusinessWeek, 3Com just scheduled a vote for 2/29 on the deal with Bain/Huawei. Huawei would own just under 16.5% of the new company, and would have the ability to appoint 3 board members. Romney would own the other 83.5%, and could appoint 8 of the 11 board members.

  • Like I said in the video, "I think I smell a rat." Romney wants to be president, but national security is less important than his own pockets.

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If Romney truly felt a conviction that same-sex marriage is wrong, then why did he take the measures he did when he was not required to. He did so of his own choosing. Again, the opinion of the court was not law, and it only advised the legislature to act. Romney would not have been constitutionally bound until the legislature acted.

  • The opinion was requested by the legislature in accordance with the Constitution of that state to have an 'opinion' of the court be given when constitutionality of something was in question. This goes beyond the 'opinion' you get when asking a friend or family member about some passing matter.

  • Now, quit relying on me to do your research for you. Go to massresistance (dot) org.

    They have everything I have given you, and more. Instead of staunchly digging in to your side, be willing to thoroughly investigate the other side.

  • He was not required by any constitutional mandate to do these things. On the contrary, his actions clearly violated his oath to uphold the laws of Massachusetts.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more