I'm so sorry for what you've been going through with your lovely wife Mary. You're right... it is the establishment, and they do treat you like victims. I have to keep records as well, to maintain my SSDI. The most I can physically do in the day, is spend time on the internet in the morning. Then I'm done for the day. I'm just too ill. (Cont.)
As far as the photo's. I would. I'd put their photo on the internet. Do they have their photo already public (as in an advertisement)? The worst that would happen would be that YT would ask you to remove the video. Expose them! Where can I buy something like that now? Does it record the conversation as well? I guess it does! LOL! I would like to set up a camera in my home. I wonder how to do that? (Cont.)
I'm not sure about the ramifications of putting up the photo of one of these blood-sucking scum, but during the case it might not be the best idea. Have you tried contacting Watchdog and the national media.. Times, Independent, Guardian, Telegraph etc? Worst thing for major companies and their solicitors is bad publicity!
NO, the simple answer is no, you will be committing a serious problem for yourself. The best thing that you can do is sue, in Court you can say anything.For example, I can say to you quite safely not to tap your fingers on the table because your mice picks it up and it is so bad for the ears.
Very interesting video. I have to sit and think about this one. Not very sure of the answer.
airricksreloaded 4 years ago
I don't always comment on your vids, but I think your wonderful and I do watch. You're both in my thoughts... always.
Sending love & smiles to you both!
(((Hugs))) to you & the Mrs....
Paula
CagedSongBird 4 years ago
I'm so sorry for what you've been going through with your lovely wife Mary. You're right... it is the establishment, and they do treat you like victims. I have to keep records as well, to maintain my SSDI. The most I can physically do in the day, is spend time on the internet in the morning. Then I'm done for the day. I'm just too ill. (Cont.)
CagedSongBird 4 years ago
Dear Colin,
I hope today finds you happy and feeling well.
As far as the photo's. I would. I'd put their photo on the internet. Do they have their photo already public (as in an advertisement)? The worst that would happen would be that YT would ask you to remove the video. Expose them! Where can I buy something like that now? Does it record the conversation as well? I guess it does! LOL! I would like to set up a camera in my home. I wonder how to do that? (Cont.)
CagedSongBird 4 years ago
another totally awesome video happy new year colin
batmanfan 4 years ago
you should check out my postings of Dyandria and Dean Loren...the judges are wired and the courts bought off
paulagloria 4 years ago
It depends. Is your lawyer more expensive than his?
uuberTOOL 4 years ago
Everybody needs their own, personal cameraman, these days.
Whoa-technology is starting to freak me out.
HDTV will be mandatory by 2010.
I'm too poor to get in an accident. FEMA already has my name on a list, somewhere, I'm sure.
dnHooligan 4 years ago
I'm not sure about the ramifications of putting up the photo of one of these blood-sucking scum, but during the case it might not be the best idea. Have you tried contacting Watchdog and the national media.. Times, Independent, Guardian, Telegraph etc? Worst thing for major companies and their solicitors is bad publicity!
Gorguruga 4 years ago
NO, the simple answer is no, you will be committing a serious problem for yourself. The best thing that you can do is sue, in Court you can say anything.For example, I can say to you quite safely not to tap your fingers on the table because your mice picks it up and it is so bad for the ears.
EmCSpiteri 4 years ago