Should Scientology be banned? - France 24 (PART 4)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
417 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 4, 2009

A France 24 news report and panel discussion (27th May 2009) about the current trial of The Church of Scientology and six of its French leaders on charges of organized fraud that could lead to an outright ban of the organization in France.

For more information see:
http://infinitecomplacency.blogspot.com/2009/06/paris-trial-iii.html
http://www.whyweprotest.net
http://www.exscientologykids.com
http://www.exscn.net

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • dangerous cult. do the emperors sacred duty and purify them

    with fire

  • You can't understand it cause you've made a "straw man logical fallacy."

    I don't want gov't to determine what cult is allowed, as "you"say. I want "individual criminal actions" punished. Such as "child slave labor" as young as 6 carrying boulders for hrs, for ex. as told by the current leader's own niece, Jenna Miscavige-Hill

    exscientologykids. com

    I know enough about you & contrary to you, enough about this cult to know you haven't got a clue

    Ron Paul is for the Rule of Law. Sorry, padnah

  • I know exactly what I'm saying.

    AND I know enough about you to make this statement - you think the government ought to be involved with determining what cult is allowed and what cult isn't allowed by your current argument alone.

    Ron Paul, nor Lew Rockwell, nor Ayn Rand for that matter would EVER condone what you're promoting although they would all agree Scientology is a cult, and a bad cult. Why you can't understand this simple concept is beyond me.

  • You, sir, don't know what you're saying. You don't know me. How can you include me in this collective?

    Can I make it simpler so YOU can understand than I already did?

    I don't want government to "stop a cult," I want "individual criminal actions" held accountable by the rule of law. See?

    I'm sure Ron Paul doesn't condone the Mafia, or any form of criminality (incl. child labor abuse of children as young as 6, or "forced" abortions) but the RULE OF LAW: Life, Liberty & the Pursuit of Happiness.

  • "You guys" are the people that want the government to protect every idiot from doing something stupid and have the idiots, you, me, and the people getting idiots to do something you consider "stupid" to pay for it.

    I don't want to pay for it.

    And furthermore, I don't trust the government when it decrees something stupid or worth preventing.

    How much simpler can I make this, so even YOU can understand it? Ron Paul wouldn't support a ban on Scientology, and neither would Lew Rockwell.

  • We agree more than you think. "Grow up" is a cheap shot. I don't want gov't to "stop a cult," I want individual criminal actions 2b held accountable by the rule of law. Period.

    Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness; or Property. And THAT was a *main* duty of our once "republican*" government (*not the party but the form of gov't we once had -- right now all we have is a form of socialism and have had it since the days of FDR, at least)

  • No. I know if I jump off a cliff I'll die.

    Two problems here: "You guys?" & "Grow up?" Keep it civil: Who's "you guys?" For one who's seemingly for "individualism," you're very willing to bunch me up in a socialistic pluralistic "collectivism." To fully und. my position I invite you to watch my video: "Interview with Edward G. Griffin @ Ron Paul Bay Area Rally" /watch?v=W-Dhv59JYpA

  • 1st of all, you're preaching to the choir: I am all for small gov't, too, myself. But we'll still need gov't & mainly to protect "we the people."

    So in your "ideal" sm. gov't (also our Founding Fathers) this is one of its essential duties: To protect Life, Liberty & the Pursuit of Happiness, or Property.

    Other than what I've pointed out, we agree 110% on our ideas about gov't, its abuses & excesses & its own criminality & disrespect for the Rule of Law, as you point out in your next comment.

  • You want to look at the mafia?

    Read Gary Webb's book "Dark Alliance".

    You guys just simply have no idea. You have absolutely no control over the government as you bitch and moan about what it should do. Look at what it's done. This is the same government that did the Tuskegee Trials and started a war that's killed around a million Iraqi's over TOTAL LIES and has held absolutely nobody accountable.

    And you want this government to help stop a cult because "it hurts people". Grow up.

  • All that has to happen for my "ideal" (if you can call it that) to happen, is for the government to go bankrupt.

    Now, either you can waste government money until it goes tits up, as you ignore it's own flagrant abuses of wasting money on total bullshit, and this will just be more bullshit to push it to the edge

    Or

    You can limit government, and prevent it ever from growing beyond control and into bankruptcy.

    Either way, my "ideal" will happen.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more