Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Martha Argerich plays Bach toccata in C Minor BWV 911 PART 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
124,684
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 19, 2007

Martha Argerich

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 13 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This interpretation is spellbinding! Excuse me, I have to go practice now...

  • I've listened to every Bach interpretation out there. Gould is too eccentric- Martha presents the purest interpretation thus far. Some pieces Gould wins me over but this one here is screaming Martha.

see all

All Comments (105)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • itz so pretty ^^ i wish i could find a cover in violin-_- ....

  • @victoriaelle7 Marta Argerich ens trasllada pau i recolliment. Gould pot arribar a excitar, a vegades. tots dos són interprets genials de Bach.

  • @0thereaper0 Great response. Dumbass fucker Brazilian gamer who doesn't know shit but trolling. That better on par of your sophistication level?

  • @ragingsun1 lol, you are stupid.

  • @0thereaper0 Stupid is a harsh word. For example, if I called you stupid just because you misused "that" in your appositive of (I, that never played piano), which should actually be who, I would be mean. If I called you stupid JUST because you used "attempts from my part", whereas it should be attempts ON my part, I would be mean. Your constant failure in common English idiomatic usage is embarrassing, yet I don't coin the term stupid regarding your state. You sir, are an idiot.

  • @ragingsun1 All I can say is that you are stupid. I'm not trying to convince you, as previous attempts from my part to convince stupid people of their stupidity didn't work out.

  • @0thereaper0 Hahahahaha no. That's poor logic. You're comparing to incomparable things. The correct analogy is Gould: Argerich, as they are both based on the grounds of talented and experienced players with respective interpretations of Bach. You are just a philistine. Please don't bring some boggling argument that stumps common sense and intuitive reasoning.

  • who is better, me or Martha? I, that never played piano, or this very experienced and talented player? Is it now a matter of taste? Actually, there is one that is better than the other, at least in some ways. It is just hard to define, because there are very few people talented enough to say who is better.

  • @dragmio capitalists and liberterians as gullible bufoons ??? hahahahahahahahahahahaha do you know you are a marxist gullible bufoon punk ? and you have taken line , bait and sinker ? punk you must be unemployed living of your parents funds like any other marxist bum !!!!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more