Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pouring molten Aluminum

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
16,941
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 28, 2007

Making Casts of P. morrisi nests

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • why did you let it out? now that shit is going for John Conner

  • Sorry

    REVOLTbydesign86

    the posting on this page seems to be all to cock.

see all

All Comments (148)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @riggermortisify Yes, exactly. Aluminum theory that recently came up is easily debunked. Not enough heat to generate the melting of other metals in the building.

  • NIST: Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials.

    All this video does is prove the first sentence right.

  • To everyone mentioning the twin towers; It happened. There's nothing specific to analyze about the tower, it was hit by a fucking plane for the love of god. Jet fuel burns hot, plus, to add you're high up, and winds add to the fire that's burning organic stuff, like wood, and whatever else may be burning. The steel failed because there's suddenly extra weight of the jet and everything else inside of it in the middle of the tower. It was not a hoax, the government had no idea about it. Get overit

  • was it a wasp nest? cool

  • Molten metal. Not molten steel.

  • They could flex a little, like when the planes hit, or in a high wind, but they couldn't topple over like a tree. Too much off of vertical stresses and they would just fall apart.

    So like with one of the towers the upper floors did tilt because one side collapsed faster, but once that one side collapsed the other side couldn't hold the weight for more than a second and then it collapsed too. Then once the upper floors fell on the lower floors that was all she wrote.

  • Well, the towers were meant to flex and then return to their normal structure like they did when the planes hit, but if the destruction was just a little bit faster on one side, it would make the collapse unbalanced and it would most likely destroy one side and leave the other with considerably less damage. In that case, it would be a gradual collapse and the perimeter columns on the other side could still hold their own and a lot more of the build would be left.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more