Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Debunking Hockney Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,031
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 4, 2010

David Hockney's "Secret Knowledge" Pg. 52-53 & 138-139

Comparing Oils and Tempura Paints: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcCHmXhhA0s

Book: "Secret Knowledge" (Expanded) by David Hockney, Viking Studio, 2006
(http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Knowledge-New-Expanded-Rediscovering/dp/B0018ZOAES­/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1273094371&sr=8-2)

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 28 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (anikinippon)

  • give me back my 3 minutes. this is retarded.

  • @MrParis1989 I encourage you to see the videos I made that are side by side comparisons of the paintings themselves. I made them in order to allow people to see the difference and not just me talking. Besides, most art scholars agree with what I say anyways, it's not likely the masters used "optical aids" such as lenses at all for their art.

  • @anikinippon the idea that a consensus of art scholars agrees on an opinion that does not require reworking the history books does not legitimize it anymore than the idea that a consensus of historians deciding to ignore the possibility that civilization is older than previously conceived based on the discovery of an underwater monolith off the coast of Honshu, Japan. Do not mistake laziness for legitimacy.

  • @MrParis1989 Your right, it's based on evidence and the evidence is so little that it wouldn't make sense to be legitimate.

  • @anikinippon in your opinion sure, obviously why you made this video. To each his own, mine happens to find the evidence sufficient enough to make a point stronger than its contrary. Regardless, it is only my opinion.... exciting times ahead.

  • @MaximillianPiras And it is possible that the Mother Mary legitimately gave birth to a child without sex. It's more likely that Joseph was just a sucker for believing her but it is possible to believe she gave birth out of parthenogenesis. It's not likely though because there is no one alive that we have proven that it actually did happen ever. Same with this and besides with some of the examples Hockney gives, the timelines for inventing these optical devices doesn't match up well.

see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • thanks for the counterpoints; It would be nice however if you pronounced the italian masters a bit more correctly, or at least make the attempt to:P

  • @xwaystranger You only have to see his portraits to see he has talent, and his use of space and light in his modern art paintings are great, too.

    Many use

  • @vlxznd What a crock of SHIT ..... lol

  • What an arrogant person.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more