Court delivers verdict in Ayodhya case

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,335
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 30, 2010

The Allahabad High Court delivered its judgment in the Ramjanmbhoomi-Babri Masjid case.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Islam didn't come to India with invaders like Ghazni or Mughals who made India their homeland much as the aryans had done but in 7th centory with traders and Indians of different religions peacefully co-existed very much as they do now. In fact even the Mughals emperors after Akbar are of Indian and Afghan lineage as the rajputs and Mughals had inter married.

  • However much the Hindutva zealots might hate Islam and Muslims and however much they might try to find a justification for their xenophobic acts of hatred, they can't change the history of India or the world. Not for lack of trying though, 'cause there are enough Hindutva versions of History floating around and the BJP Govt, has tried its best to popularise this propganda in text books during its time in govt. but there are enough serious scholars of History who keep correcting this falsehood.

  • Look at the Full..... Complete picture..... Muslims are not a Minority in India...In fact ...Muslims.. are not a minority anywhere...... Are they not supposed to be the fastest growing religion.....?.... as they always claim....?

    It is the other way around.....

    In this whole world...... full of Christians..... and Muslims...... Hindus and Sikhs and Jains ..... are a Minority....... Protect the rights of ...... Hindus....... Sikhs... ..jains ....and .. Buddhists...FIRST....

    Jai Hind

  • In our nation Muslims are much matured and has got religious tolerance than hindus. Demolishing of the Masjid itself is a shameful act. After riots created by the BJP and Shiv sena made us lower our heads in shame in front of the international community. Shame on us. While the muslim heads passed the message of peace and respect for the Court, our shameless religious heads passed threatening comments. Shame

  • our constitution  has framed in 1950...i thnk we have no ri8 to talk abut past moghals

  • jai sree ram for a fact we are not anti muslims we have sallu ammir srk muslim living with us but ayodhaya is hindu sacred place and we will not allow neone to build a mosque at that place reason do you woll allow to make a temple at makka or church at makka mosque so sorry muslims we all must hail the verdict and in today report their are reports tha the case will not go to supreme court reason that ASI AND JAPANESE experts have prooved that temple was demolished to make the mosque so no scope

  • JAI SREE RAM.THIS IS OUR LOYALITY WE GAVE 1/3 OF PLACE. THIS IS THE DEMOCRACY OF INDIA.CAN HINDU GO TO PAKISTAN AND ASK FOR A NEEDLE OF PLACE.SO MY DEAR MUSLIM BROS BE HAPPY WITH WHAT U GOT. LETS STOP THE TOPIC HERE. IF NO BE READY FOR THE NEXT.

  • muslim judge role in this case in suspect how can he say so surely even after ASI proof that their was a temple did he seen whether the temple was standing or it was in reins the only thing to proove was whether a temple was their or not and it was prooved by ASI AND JAPANESE EXPERTS so why the hell muslim leaders are lying that the verdict is based on faith dont lie imams the verdict is based on technical evidence and muslim leaders only talk to media they have no proof

  • if ASI has proved that temple was demolished then why 1/3rd land to muslim just because they illegally grab the land and pray there for years they have a share muslim judge in this case is suspect how can he say temple was not demolished to build the mosque and it was build on the reins of temple only it can be said that a temple was surely their acc to japanes and ASI report how can the muslim judge say that it was already in reins a commision must inquire about muslim judge

  • BHARATVASI and all the point that ram was born at that particular place means in strong word judges reject the plea of muslim side thats all and the evidence is given by ASI AND JAPANESE experts and not by faith as told by sum muslims leader infact i am challenging muslims to go to SC reason the verdict is illegal muslim cant be given even a 1/3rd to muslim reason the reason given by judge is that thery are offering prayers for years therefore they will also get a piece of land this is illegal

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more