Libertarian Wet Dream...One World Government?

The New York Times is out with a new story today on WPP - a London-based corporation that is buying up most of the big lobbying shops here in Washington, DC. The Times refers to the company as a "consolidating force at work in the influence-peddling industry." WPP is a $72 billion dollar foreign corporation - running more than 150 public relations, advertising, and lobbying companies employing nearly 160,000 people. And K. Street is getting devoured by WPP - as more and more lobbying boutiques join up with the massive one-stop shop of influence. As the Times writes, "WPP has become, in effect, a special interest mega-firm, with offerings for conservatives and liberals, environmentalists and polluters, gun lovers and gun haters, Tea Party die-hards and public sector unions, old guard media and their high tech competitors - the entire gamut from left to right, top to bottom."

So if you're a Texas energy baron - and you want to blow up EPA regulations on toxic coal ash - then reach out to WPP - where you'll have... First, access to their public relations team to promote your corporation and give it a good name in the community. Second, access to their advertising team to run smears against the EPA and "job-killing" regulations. And third, access to a lobbyist to whip up support for your anti-EPA agenda on Capitol Hill. Mitt Romney's Bain Capital did just that in 2011 - giving WPP $320,000 to monitor "tax reform development." And here's what's most troubling - WPP runs operations in 107 different nations including the United States - it's like an unofficial branch of government that knows no national boundaries. This is a Libertarian's wet-dream - a one-world, corporate government that answers to profits instead of principles. And it shows that those of us who want restore true democracy - represented by "we the people" and not corporations - still have a lot of work to left to do.




Throughout history - democratic governments have always been a society's best defense against massive wealth and corporate power. But now that democracy is being privatized and monopolized, it's increasingly going to the highest bidder. While WPP can run these operations in numerous countries, the US is particularly vulnerable, because our Supreme Court hatched this bizarre idea that money isn't property like common sense would tell us, but that it's actually a form of speech, which the First Amendment says can't be regulated. Because of this Supreme Court-created doctrine - which no president and no Congress has ever advocated - in fact, many have pushed back against it - because of this, WPP and other big corporations can essentially buy the laws they want.

This is not democracy in action - it's the death of democracy at the hand of big corporations like Bain Financial and JP Morgan Chase. We need our lawmakers to ban the practice of corporations writing laws, giving those laws to legislators along with big campaign checks, and running massive advertising and PR campaigns to ensure public acceptance of those laws. But for now, it's illegal for our legislators to enact such a ban, because the Supreme Court says they'd be trampling the free speech rights - the use of money - of the corporations the Supreme Court recognizes as "people." It's time to put an end to the subversion of democracy in America by a British corporation. But before that can be done, we need to stop the Supreme Court from pushing their bizarre doctrine that corporations are people and money is speech. For that, go to movetoamend.org and join in the movement to amend the Constitution to end this corruption of democracy by the Supreme Court.

• Category

  News & Politics

[Vierotchka]

No - I'm saying that I couldn't survive as a hunter-gatherer in the Kalahari desert because of the heat and because my western body is not adapted to that climate. No doubt I could survive as a hunter-gatherer in Northern Europe, I did so for many months in Scandinavia, albeit not during the winter.

[Karenronwood]

So you're saying that you couldn't survive as a hunter-gatherer?

[Vierotchka]

I've done that too, but my western sub-standard body could not sustain it for more than a couple of months.

[Karenronwood]

You obviously can afford a computer, and an Internet connection. If life as a nomad on the plains of Africa is such a better way of life then why don't you go do that?

[Vierotchka]

By sub-standard humans I mean all western and Asian peoples whose diet and lifestyle has rendered basically unhealthy and incapable of living the rustic but healthy life that the San people live. Nothing about recognizing this fact can lead to genocide and war. The fact that you were unable to understand this only shows sub-standard thought processing.

[Karenronwood]

Use more Ad hominem attacks please. I'm done talking to you. I don't care to waste my time, or energy on anyone who views anyone as a "sub-standard human." That's the sort of thinking that leads to genocide, and war. All humans have the same rights. Period.