Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

BBC/OU Annual Lecture 2009: Dawkins on Darwin (Part 3 of 5)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,887
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 13, 2009

Professor Richard Dawkins delivered this year's Open University lecture at the Natural History Museum on Tuesday 17th March 2009. Dawkins presented to an invited audience and investigated if Darwin was the most revolutionary scientist ever, and examined the evolutionary theories of his contemporaries.

Dawkins suggests that there are four "bridges to evolutionary understanding" and illustrates this with four claimants to the evolution of natural selection: Edward Blyth, Patrick Matthew, Alfred Wallace and Charles Darwin. The fifth bridge of evolutionary understanding is identified as modern genetics which he terms digital Darwinism.

via http://RichardDawkins.net

http://www.AtheistMedia.com

-

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mapscannotcontainme couldn´t agree more with everything you say, they were both, a tribute to the scientific ideal

  • First of all, thanks for the upload.

    Second of all, is anyone else as profoundly impressed by the apparently amicable way in which Darwin and Wallace agreed to recognize the independent conclusion the other made as I am? The maturity and integrity of that decision about such a monumental scientific claim is almost as impressive to me as the theory of evolution by natural itself. As if I needed another reason to admire Darwin and Wallace...I have it, regardless, though.

  • I want to know more about the 'steam governor', as mentioned at 3:30.

    Can anyone suggest, via Youtube, a good explanation?

  • @Mr88playmaker

    The Logos is a more complex idea than you make of it. I suppose that I have only read Heraclitus on the subject, so I may be wrong, but he seemed to have used the term to mean pattern or perhaps even Law of Nature. I know that "logos" literally means word, but its usage implies it had a different connotation.

  • in that case nous ingreek is not not but nouse with a e and logos in greek don t know where or who told you what you say it is not true at all it mean science or knowleg i have been studying the rooth of language for many years donot dispute that i sure you do not know the rooth of demon,sin ,soual,sin. german, vilain ect... i can give you some lesson over it if you want me to some word as to be decompose like the word israel, leviathan, moses,genesis,ramses even the name jesus ect...

  • I'm referring to "Nous" in GREEK (not French);

    1. NOUS (Greek) = Mind or Intellect.

    2. LOGOS (Greek) = The source and fundamental order of the cosmos, Communication or discourse, communication of thought by words; talk; conversation: earnest and intelligent discourse.

    a formal discussion of a subject in speech or writing, ., any unit of connected speech or writing longer than a sentence.

    DNA code arises out of Nous.

    Information & language arise out of in a mind.

    (see: nous / logos).

  • nous/logos??? nous: sec personne du pluriel on french,logo means knowleg,science what are you talkinf about to tell you another things Einstein did not belive in real god even he say the mind of god he was using a metaphor

  • Thank you for the upload

  • thank u sir dawkins.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more