Wrestlemania 5, Hulk Hogan vs Macho Man

That's the way we love him! Hulk still Rules

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Hulk
• Hogan
• Hulkster
• Wrestlemania
• Macho
• Man
• Randy
• Savage
• WWF
• Wrestling

[Krillep]

R.I.P Macho Man

[evilmm80]

At least Macho had a year long reign.

[audiopro316]

Does anyone have the Hulkster and Miss Elizabeth sex tape from this night?

[mbryanf]

thanks for the video, and the resolution is amazing!

[radicalman33]

@Gr8muta

i hate when ppl make comments saying "this guy was underrated. he never got a run with the world/IC title." they just fail to realize that just because today belts are passed around every other month doesnt mean that back in the day having a sucsessful wrestling career didnt mean you had the belt. i got into an arguement about rick rude. they thought he was underrated because he never won the WWF title. they fail to realize that in that era he did his job perfectly

[radicalman33]

@shubz1223

seriously....most guys wrestle for the exersize, who cares about money.

[Gr8muta]

@radicalman33 Im with you on that. I believe we are on the same page. Finally encountered someone with common sense here on yoututbe lol.

[radicalman33]

@Gr8muta

being "deemed" the best and being the best are 2 different things. like you said savage was (perhaps) the best in the company, but he was not deemed that way because in that era wrestling was becoming more about bodyslams and big guys like hogan. i understand what you mean by saying savage had the credibility to hold the title and i agree with you. i think we are on the same page, but because we discussing this by text on youtube we are misunderstand each other.

[Gr8muta]

@radicalman33 Thanks for your response! I will have to say that wearing the title does signify that you are the best! To further expalin in wrestling terms...you are the man the company has decided to push an build around. So yes, it does signify you as being "deemed" the best. Santino and Barry-O would never hold that title because they are indeed not viewed as viable title holders. I think u misunderstood why i was saying that. IC title was indeed the "work horse" title!

[radicalman33]

@Gr8muta

wearing the title has nothing to do with signifying that you are the best in the company. when looking at it as a child it does, but not in reality. but when you are a child you think that hulk hogan and ultimate warrior are the best wrestlers in the world. savage was a terrific wrestler, but so where many others. none of those guys got the belt because the world champ is the face, not the wrestler. thats what the IC belt was for. great wrestlers held the IC title then

[Gr8muta]

@radicalman33 I see what your saying and do agree! However, wearing the world title signifies that you are the best in that company. Savage, on a whole, was the best in that company. Hogan was the chosen one (rightfully arguable) Cena is not the best in the company based on a pure wrestling standpoint...but damn that dude can draw (106 million is his WWE worth) I totally get it. I only used Flair as an example because he was Hogans Contemporary in a rival company. He was a factor in my opinion.