Sponsor: http://NotFatAnymore.com - Is it "neoconservative" to spend ourselves into military collapse? How will we bomb things if we can't buy the bombs? If you cherish our military adventures, ...
Sponsor: http://NotFatAnymore.com - Is it "neoconservative" to spend ourselves into military collapse? How will we bomb things if we can't buy the bombs? If you cherish our military adventures, take note: We're out of money and Dr. Paul's controlled drawdown may be the only way to prevent a collapse so complete it costs America her ability to project power. BTW I'm actually not a neocon myself but could be considered a former neocon since I've always liked Krauthammer (I have his autograph) and Kirkpatrick.
If you want to commission an ad like the one in this video, the cost as of 3/08 is roughly three cents per video view. But views after the first week are free, and your hyperlink in the video descrip is free. PM me here at the Youtube channel or e-mail me: RidleyReport at live period com
Additional Keywords: freedom new hampshire nutritional cleansing dr. natrajan ron paul revolution dave ridley report libertarian democrat republican politics hillary clinton barack obama john mccain george bush dick cheney free state project liberty dollar bernard von nothaus 2008 USA primary caucus national convention delegate dennis Kucinich patriot torture waterboarding iraq war anti-war afghanistan ramstein military bases war on terror TSA Al-Qaeda al-Qaida al-Qa'ida al-Qa'idah government gold silver platinum commodity market depression recession ronald reagan jean kirkpatrick charles krauthammer conservative liberal hyperinflation inflation terrorism military empire imperial debt market anarchist anarchocapitalist fox news federal feds gulf war saddam hussein veterans army osama bin laden
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video is just another tired misrepresentation of neoconservative philosophy, which is continually fed to impressionable minds by people in positions of legitimacy like Ron Paul. He has routinely mischaracterized neocons by parroting some of the most common myths perpetrated by their detractors, i.e.: the percieved notions that they're ardent scholars of Strauss, believe in American colonialism, embrace perpetual worldly conflict, believe in "noble lies", act as an Israeli proxy, etc..
LuckyPierre78, as I am very interested in this subject, I should like to know what exactly the neoconservatives really want and believe in. If what you call the "common myths" are not true, what IS the truth regarding the neoconservatives?
It's important to understand that neoconservatism is not a movement aspiring to central organized characteristics, but rather a tendency. There is no set of neoconservative beliefs, only a set of attitudes derived from historical experience. The neocon position might be summed up as diplomacy if possible, force if necessary; the UN if possible, ad hoc coalitions or unilateral action if necessary; preemptive strikes if it's reasonable to anticipate hostile action on the part of America's enemies.
The ideas that have come to be associated with neocons are more a product of the circumstances in which the world finds itself, than a result of the success of a cabal of mainly Jewish intellectuals in capturing the hearts and minds of both the Blair and Bush administrations. Barring extraordinary events, the US will always feel obliged to defend, if possible, a democratic nation under attack from non-democratic forces. No complicated geopolitical calculations of national interest are necessary.
It's a malicious myth to suggest that neocons are Jews who serve the interests of Israel. Yes, neocons have links to the Likud Party, but they also have links to the British Tories and other conservative parties around the world. These connections reflect ideological, not ethnic, affinity. While many neocons are Jewish, many are not. Yet they are as committed to Israel's defense as Jewish neocons are, a commitment based not on shared religion or ethnicity but on shared liberal democratic values.
Neocons are hardly a well-organized, well-funded cabal. The Project for a New American Century, the leading neocon foreign policy think tank had a staff of five. Its resources pale next to the Brookings Institution, Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute, three of the biggest Washington think tanks, none of them sympathetic to the neoconservative vision of foreign policy. Neocons have been relatively influential because of the strength of their arguments, not their connections.
Like most conservatives, neocons are deeply suspicious of the United Nations, which they fear is animated by anti-Americanism. But unlike some on the right, they are happy to make common cause with the UN when doing so will serve US interests. Neocons are committed above all to US global leadership, and they know that the costs of such leadership are so high that the United States needs allies to share the burden. For this reason, neocons have been vocal advocates of expanding NATO.
According to some of their more heated critics, neocons view the world in Manichean terms, guided by the spirit of Leo Strauss. This portrayal isa crude caricature of those who believe that American values are worth defending at home and abroad. That conviction was, in fact, the view of Strauss, himself a largely apolitical professor. He was a firm believer in US democracy, which, he thought, needed to be defended by a well-educated elite. Strauss inspired some early neocons; few read him today.
LuckyPierre78, thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate it. As English is not my native language and because I am not familiar with the subject, it will take me some time to fully comprehend what you have written. You are obviously very knowledgeable. Thanks.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.