"NeoCon for Ron" - Why Neoconservatives should back Ron Paul

Sponsor: http://NotFatAnymore.com - Is it "neoconservative" to spend ourselves into military collapse? How will we bomb things if we can't buy the bombs? If you cherish our military adventures, take note: We're out of money and Dr. Paul's controlled drawdown may be the only way to prevent a collapse so complete it costs America her ability to project power. BTW I'm actually not a neocon myself but could be considered a former neocon since I've always liked Krauthammer (I have his autograph) and Kirkpatrick.

If you want to commission an ad like the one in this video, the cost as of 3/08 is roughly three cents per video view. But views after the first week are free, and your hyperlink in the video descrip is free. PM me here at the Youtube channel or e-mail me: RidleyReport at live period com

Additional Keywords: freedom new hampshire nutritional cleansing dr. natrajan ron paul revolution dave ridley report libertarian democrat republican politics hillary clinton barack obama john mccain george bush dick cheney free state project liberty dollar bernard von nothaus 2008 USA primary caucus national convention delegate dennis Kucinich patriot torture waterboarding iraq war anti-war afghanistan ramstein military bases war on terror TSA Al-Qaeda al-Qaida al-Qa'ida al-Qa'idah government gold silver platinum commodity market depression recession ronald reagan jean kirkpatrick charles krauthammer conservative liberal hyperinflation inflation terrorism military empire imperial debt market anarchist anarchocapitalist fox news federal feds gulf war saddam hussein veterans army osama bin laden

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• neoconservative
• ron
• paul
• hillary
• clinton
• barack
• obama
• john
• mccain
• iraq
• war
• osama
• bin
• laden
• Al-Qaeda

[JeffnDenmark]

Of course it's not a neoconservitive position. A lot of neocons are a bunch of ignorant flag waving phonies, that don't have a clue about what is really going on. Thanks for trying to explain it to them, even if most of them won't see your video, because they are to busy getting their propaganda from FOX news.

[kmeixner]

Interesting perspective, but unfortunately it is the Royal Families, the world leaders that are covertly related to them and the global bankers who want to see America, disarmed, bankrupt and destroyed, especially the middle class. These people are loyal to building an international tyrannical one-world government structure covertly using things like war of terror fear-mongering and climate change paranoia to dupe people into giving away their freedoms for a false sense of security.

[RJMooreII]

There is the issue that a lot of NeoConservatives come from a Lovestonite anti-Stalinist background; they believe it is the duty and right of the US to 'spread democracy' by bombs.

[noobler9]

neoconservatism has an article on wikipedia

htt p://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Neoconservatism

note how military action is supported by them, it is NOT however, the only methodology

lately it's been getting a bad rap because of bush's rhetoric

thing is, a lot of people felt within the neocon camp that bush's methodology was flawed, although his rhetoric is highly similar to the neocon's in reasoning, the methods were as many felt, based on incompetency as opposed to any real sense of understanding

[noobler9]

contrary to what a lot of people who claimed to be neoconservatives because they simply felt "bombing the democracy into a country" would be a good idea is... a lot of neoconservatives feel that it is unwise to attempt to do so, rather the idea is to take out specific individuals and organizations that pose a clear danger to the group you are a part of, in this case a nation called america, and to increase affluence in developing countries

[noobler9]

however, that's only the best way to go about it as far as I'm concerned, or would've been the best way rather

your rhetoric's not very accurate... neoconservatism isn't so much solely about bombing other countries, it's about exportation of western values, through any means really, not simply militaristic means

and it doesn't mean cultural imperialism either, it means a slight imposition in foreign locations so that a comparison in that culture can be made between western and other ideals

[noobler9]

speaking as someone who agrees with a lot of neoconservative stuff, iraq is a strategic error, it's stupid because it's ineffective

overseas action is fine, afghanistan is alright

in actuality, a BIGGER occupation would've succeeded, it's because of the military methods, crushing an insurgent movement before it can really start, is the key, but instead they let everyone go wild in the chaos and disbanded the system as corrupt/bad as it was pre-invasion, it was SOMETHING, and then there wasn't

[PikSokolit]

I am a traditional conservative similar to Ron Paul and i want nothing to do with these NeoCon communist pigs.

[CentrlFlagrl]

Let's let Ron Paul speak for himself. Where is your actual video of Ron Paul saying the things that you imply? Being noticeably absent, I would hope that people would take a look at what he does say.

Does walking through a gun shop signify a neocon? GEEZ!

[whynotflip]

OH MY GOD!!! Please NO neocons in this movement! NO THANK YOU.

[wauzi123]

LuckyPierre78, thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate it. As English is not my native language and because I am not familiar with the subject, it will take me some time to fully comprehend what you have written. You are obviously very knowledgeable. Thanks.

[LuckyPierre78]

According to some of their more heated critics, neocons view the world in Manichean terms, guided by the spirit of Leo Strauss. This portrayal isa crude caricature of those who believe that American values are worth defending at home and abroad. That conviction was, in fact, the view of Strauss, himself a largely apolitical professor. He was a firm believer in US democracy, which, he thought, needed to be defended by a well-educated elite. Strauss inspired some early neocons; few read him today.