Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Robert Spencer on Islam: REFUTED 1of 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
10,620
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 19, 2007

We take on the claims of Robert Spencer in an Interview he had on FoxLOSE, and Refute his points 1 by 1.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 107 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • LOOOOOOOOL why did you filther my post cant handle the truth? Im not surprised all muslims can do against truth is try to shut the people speaking it up ,your pathetic 

  • And if you weren't afraid to post actual feedback here you wouldn't need to screen the responses. But then again, Islam isnt exactly big on free speech is it?

see all

All Comments (666)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MattyJames25 Yes I urge everyone reading this to do REAL RESEARCH .Not going to hate sites and Christian evangelist sites that lie and twist, and mis-inform because they have a clear anti Muslim, anti islamic agenda. mattyjames is a damn liar as you see I have refuted him in several post already. Everything he says is twisted to make islam look bad yet the sources he sites even say the Meccans had persecuted the Muslim. Yet he ignores that very fact just to satisfy his bigotry against islam.

  • @MattyJames25 OH what anti muslim propaganda BULL SHIT!! The treaty of Hudaybiyah was not given on false promises so what the hell are you talking about? Damn, all your facts are just lies and misinformation. The Quran even tells us the Pagans broke the treaty and attacked the muslims 1st in Quran 9:13 . The Quran ordered the muslims to be true to the treaties so cut the BS!

    You sorry ass bigots have to make up these fantastic claims in order to justify your bigotry. But you're exposed LIAR!

  • @MattyJames25 You forget to mention that ibn Ishaq and others tell how the Quraiza betrayed the Muslims and how the punishment given to Quraiza was actually from the Jews own Torah (Deut 20:10-14) Where the Jews are told kill the men,and take the women and children as slaves when ever they defeated and enemy.But being the dishonest bigot you are you LEAVE THAT PART OUT!.

    And Wrong luke 19:27 does quote Jesus as he begins to speak in the 1st person. Nice try but you fail. HYPOCRITE!

  • @MattyJames25 LOL great Arab Historian Al Waqidi? NOT! According to Ibn Sad, the opposition in Mecca started when Muhammad delivered verses that condemned idol worship and the Meccan forefathers who engaged in polytheism. Fazlur Rahman writes Following the emigration, the Meccans seized the properties of the Muslim emigrants in Mecca. It was after this that raids were done because Meccans had the muslims properties . SO STOP YOUR DAMN LIES!!

  • @MrIslamAnswersback "And you lie when you claim he dishonored treaties."

    I urge you and everyone here reading this to research the historical circumstances of the Treaty of Hudaybiyah. When criticized for signing a deal with Israel in 2002, Yasser Arafat addressed the Palestinian Legislative Council saying "remember the treaty of Hudaybiyah".

    For those who know Islamic history, this is a euphemism for giving false promises until strength can be accrued to renege and resume warfare.

  • @MrIslamAnswersback

    Please read the works of the great Arab historian Al-Waqidi: Muhammad's first real successful raid occurred in January of 624 outside of Nakhla which is what caused the Meccans to fight him.

    Ibn Ishaq tells us how Muhammad beheaded the Quraiza Jews & sold them to slavery.

    Now "compare" this to the life and teachings of Jesus and you'll have the full understanding of hypocrisy. And BTW, your Luke 19:27 example does not quote Jesus but the merchant in the story. Nice try.

  • @MattyJames25 WRONG!. We bring up christianity to expose the double standard and hypocrisy you have.

    And Muhammad and the Muslim were attacked and persecuted before any raid took place. And if you really had read history you would have not left out the part that said the raids were to get back the property the Meccans had taken from the muslims after they ran the muslims out of mecca. And you lie when you claim he dishonored treaties.

    Your not referring to history, but to anti-muslim BS!

  • I don't know why Muslims can't engage a debate on Islam's tendencies for violence without making comparisons to Christianity.

    And on the topic of the Meccan persecution of Muhammad and the early Muslims, you do understand that Muhammad was conducting raids on their merchant trades routes which would yield a military response from any society, right? Muhammad routinely used rouses and dishonored treaties to further his imperial enterprise.

    I am referring to history, not religious doctrine here

  • @stevenpaddybwoy You wont do a damn thing punk!!! And your argument is total BS! That younger wife he had was already past Puberty , YOU FAIL!!! POW SMASH CRASH!!!! Now get the hell on ,dumb ass bigot!!!

  • @stevenpaddybwoy Cause you posted BULLL SHIT LIES!!!!!!!! Thats why!!!! And I did and can refute any BULLLLLL SHIT LIES you bring!!!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more