Upload

This video is unavailable.

Lance Armstrong & Paul Kimmage verbal battle at Tour of California 2009

Cyclefilm - Cycling Media Production Cyclefilm - Cycling Media Production·278 videos
13,839

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
237,877
Like     Dislike 22

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Cyclefilm - Cycling Media Production's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Cyclefilm - Cycling Media Production's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Cyclefilm - Cycling Media Production's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 15, 2009

Watch what happens when Paul Kimmage from the UK Sunday Times confronts Lance Armstrong on doping issues during the Amgen Tour of California Press Conference. "What is it about those dopers you admire so much?"

Video produced by CYCLEFILM. All rights reserved.
CYCLEFILM is a European based production company specializing in informative cycling documentaries, how-to ride and reconnaissance films for indoor training as well as promotional films and news gathering for cycling events, pro teams and trade shows around the world.

Don't Dream it, Do it - Cyclefilm Founder/Director Markus Neuert

Training DVDs available from our online Shop:
http://cyclefilm.com/shop

Digital Downloads via the download store:
http://www.e-junkie.com/cyclefilm

FOLLOW CYCLEFILM ON TWITTER:
http://twitter.com/cyclefilm

CONNECT ON FACEBOOK:
http://facebook.com/cyclefilm

CYCLEFILM HOME:
http://cyclefilm.con

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Toffeeboyish

    A truly horrendous human being. A sociopath, a liar, a bully, a hypocrite, and a cheat.

    He made a fortune out of cancer, which may have been self induced, and yet still hides behind it, and its victims, to in some way justify his behaviour. A future Governor of Texas?

    Respect to Paul Kimmage, David Walsh and others for refusing to be bullied, or to play along with the lie.

    · 11

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Toffeeboyish's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Toffeeboyish's comment.
  • RonnyUniverse

    HA HA, Guess what?? Lance got caught with his fingers in the cookie jar. He got seven cookies out safely but when he went back for cookie 8 & 9 He got caught

    · 11

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate RonnyUniverse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate RonnyUniverse's comment.

Video Responses


All Comments (1,038)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • alexis david

    Hamilton says in his book that Arstrong has taken the first step by telling the truth- page 273 - but that the lie was so vast that it can only come out in stages he cannot just flip a switch and be 100% transparent. He goes on to say that he feels some empathy for him and at some point 'enough is enough'. He knows the truth has set him free and I think wants it for him too. Hamilton suffered a lot from Armstrongs influence but if he can sincerely say that then thats good enough for me.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate alexis david's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate alexis david's comment.
    in reply to rockethead7 (Show the comment)
  • rockethead7

    I said I agreed with you once I understood that you implied "if" Armstrong did XYZ. But, my point was, the odds of that happening are like winning the lottery. Armstrong isn't showing ANY signs of remorse. He lied like a madman in the Oprah interview, only confessing the bare minimum, still covering up most of his crimes. He continues to support and endorse the doping culture.

    Don't talk to me about Armstrong's forgiveness while he was a destructive fraud for 18 years, AND STILL IS ONE NOW.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.
    in reply to alexis david (Show the comment)
  • alexis david

    Armstrongs actions were deplorable and he does deserve to be punished which he is being -life ban, law suits, vilifiaction etc My point is this: can a man however bad his crimes be rehabilitated or not. Do they even deserve the chance? You say no and thats fair enough. I say rehabilitation is possible. By no means certain but it is possible. Hate just breeds hate and the more Armstrong is hated the more he will hate. Who gains from that? We all need forgiveness.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate alexis david's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate alexis david's comment.
    in reply to rockethead7 (Show the comment)
  • rockethead7

    (again, this is a 2nd reply to the same message)

    As for your final sentence, saying that we should give Armstrong more time... it just seems like you've got your head stuck in a hole, and you just can't accept reality. Armstrong had EIGHTEEN YEARS of lies. You say he needs more time now?

    He finally admitted a small fraction of his crimes (only after being backed into a corner), and he continues to lie about most of his other crimes. Should we wait another 18 years for him to admit the rest?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.
    in reply to alexis david (Show the comment)
  • rockethead7

    Your list of names of people Armstrong destroyed is far too short. And, the sad reality is that we'll probably never know about most of them. For 18 years, Armstrong sued anyone and everyone who he thought might reveal the truth. Of course, most lawsuits are settled with a non-disclosure agreement. Armstrong said on Oprah that he sued so many people that he couldn't even remember who they all were (one of the few true things he said). Now there are countless people who can never come forward.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.
    in reply to laochranangael (Show the comment)
  • rockethead7

    You strike me as someone who hasn't read any of the materials that are counter to your position. What about the bribery to the UCI? What about the many counts of perjury, fraud, and drug trafficking Armstrong is guilty of?

    Get this through your head: he's not just another doped up athlete who cheated and got caught. He's a remorseless pig who destroyed countless people's careers/finances for a period of 18 years, and not merely other dopers, but also any innocents who stumbled across his path.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.
    in reply to alexis david (Show the comment)
  • laochranangael

    His denial of drug use is not the problem for most people. Rather it is his horrific treatment of Emma O'Reilly, whom he labelled an alcoholic whore, his treatment of a true hero, Christophe Bassons, whom he bullied out of the tour, his treatment of the Andreus, his usage of a deadly disease as a shield against being subject to due scrutiny and so forth.

    His drug usage is largely irrelevant except for the fact that it revealed the limitless and deplorable depths to which Armstrong would sink.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate laochranangael's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate laochranangael's comment.
    in reply to alexis david (Show the comment)
  • alexis david

    The culture of doping in Armstrongs era was very sophisticated EPO etc In the 80's the only drug that could not be detected was cortisone. Fignon admitted it was used extensively as well as amphetamines when there would be no drug testing. My point is Armstrong did not start this.It was the culture for decades. The other riders of Armstrongs era denied for years too not just Armstrong. If there is no remorse then he deserves to be vilified. Guess all I'm saying is give the guy a bit more time.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate alexis david's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate alexis david's comment.
    in reply to rockethead7 (Show the comment)
  • rockethead7

    (2nd reply)

    Here's the thing: not only is he already on his millionth chance, but in order to be entitled to a 2nd chance he'd have to truly be remorseful.

    But, he isn't remorseful. He sent that message loud and clear with the non-stop parade of lies throughout the Oprah interview.

    My favorite lie was: "My wife said I could still race after 2005, but I should do it clean." Pfft!! The wife objected to the cheating, but she didn't object to the fraudulent lawsuits that ruined people's lives? Sure.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.
    in reply to alexis david (Show the comment)
  • rockethead7

    Well, look, this isn't about second chances. Second chances go to those who screw up, get caught, apologize, and move on. Armstrong is on his 19736249th chance. After 18 years of ruining people's lives, you can no longer call it a 2nd chance.

    And, he only admitted the absolute bare minimum (and did that only after the 1000 page USADA report left him no other choice), and continues to lie about everything after 2005.

    The only thing he's sorry for is that he got caught. He's not sorry beyond that.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate rockethead7's comment.
    in reply to alexis david (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement

Suggestions

Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later