Siskel and Ebert debate Cronenberg's Crash
Uploader Comments (urckrecords)
Top Comments
-
I think it's hilariously ironic that the reasons that Roger Ebert defends Crash are the same reasons he totally dismisses David Lynch's Blue Velvet!
All Comments (203)
-
"It's Hooey!"
-
I miss these two debating over films. R.I.P Gene Siskel.
-
I've seen it a few times. It's more interesting each time.
-
@joemj413 no
-
A short summary
"Gene: But are they interesting?
Roger: Let me get this straight. You honestly don't think seeing Elastigirl getting fucked is interesting?"
Thumbs up for the reference!
-
"This movie was hot. I came 5 times," Roger Ebert
-
This movie is an examination of sexual fetish. But instead of using the common fetishes like feet or bondage or rubber dress up, they use and obsession with car crashes. And by doing so explore how the human mind can find an erotic connection with otherwise non erotic situations.
-
These are the moments that I love Ebert the most
-
This is, I think, the weirdest discussion I've seen them have.
-
I like Cronenberg but I didn't really like this movie. I wouldn't quite put it in the artsie trash realm, but it didn't come off as profound to me either. I just didn't care what happened, though in some ways I do respect it as art.
check the outtake clip that's on YouTube, they clown each other pretty good!
urckrecords 10 months ago
Full Metal Jacket > Crash
joemj413 10 months ago
@joemj413 that goes without saying!
urckrecords 10 months ago
Spader grosses me out, so skip. Cronenberg is like an eqired taste. Some like his work and some don't. I get creeped out so much by his films that I only see a few seens here and there. The other problem I have with his films is that the main actor is always an actor I can't stand.
Sleepingsparklegirl 1 year ago
@Sleepingsparklegirl fair enough
Do you happen to like Viggo Mortenson, Jeff Goldblum, Jeremy Irons, Jude Law, Christopher Walken, Ralph Fiennes, Oliver Reed, or James Woods by chance?
urckrecords 1 year ago 6