Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Scott Roeder Warns Press: More Violence To Come (HQ)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,837
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 10, 2009

David Shuster discusses the shooting of Dr. George Tiller by accused Scott Roeder and his warning to the press that more violence will come wtih Dr. Warren Hern via telephone. MSNBC News Live (aired: 06/08/09).

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (130)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @YHWHisSovereign

    view it as you may tea bagger. let's forget about the real murderer here, and pin this on a man doing his job.

  • Zulu 9 FTW

  • This Dr. death who was speaking is sure some fascist pig. He loves to kill babies, ripping them apart and watching them squirm in pain. He is another monster like Tiller. He distorts everything he says. The Constitution is clearly against the murder of babies, but yet he says that those apposed to the murder of babies are against the Constitution. How freaking twisted can one be in their thinking? Well, anyone who enjoys ripping babies apart is twisted, and has no morals.

  • It's disturbing that there are people who don't let the dead rest.

    Personally, I am neutral, like many others, but being pro-life is becoming a misconceived cliche. While in a casual sense, an abortion to many women may seem immoral, there are exceptions that should be acknowledged.

  • Hern just might end up like Tiller. Those who live by the sword (or scalpel) generally die by the sword. We reap what we sow.

  • @AEVautomatic The skin cell contains the same genetic instructions that any other cell in the human body. Is a fetal cell human? Are your stomach lining cells human?

    At what point does a collection of cells constitute a human?

    You neglected to answer all but the first of thee original questions. I really what to know where you stand on what is a human and what is not. I don't think it is an easy question to answer and careful consideration (not irrational dogma) must be made in answering

  • @drfoxcourt It is not human because it is a skin cell. That is a really stupid question you asked.

  • @AEVautomatic What is it about a skin cell that is not human? Is a stem cell more human than a skin cell? How about a fetal cell?

    When does a collection of cells become a human? Conception as some religious would have it, or the time drawn by the Supreme Court (who considered it on scientific merits)?" Read the case file on Roe V Wade before making ad hominems.

    There are fewer cells at stake in a legal abortion that there are in the showering you do each week.

  • @drfoxcourt wow tard alert everyone. A skin cell is not a human idiot.

  • i dont like seeing a bunch of 14-6 yr old with babies... it ruins lives, families and their future and education.... why dont these murder criminals think about these stuff? Instead of killing a bunch of doctors.. why should teach sex education and hand out birth control pills and talk about responsibilities... IDK!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more