Response to HTWW on $200K Student Debt, Part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
178 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (InfidelAvenger)

  • Nice video. I don't know if I agree with all your points, but you make your points reasonably. I was a subscriber of HTWW from the start, but I just unsubbed, due to him deleting my comment on his return to ebegging. He has a paypal link in every video description since this week. I think Lee's a smart guy. He became a YT partner, he got a job at CEI, all from his videos. He's also writing a book. So why does he need donations? How much does it cost to run a camera he owns for 15 minutes?

  • @Thorbie People get addicted to e-begging. They "can't imagine" going back to making videos for the sake of it, even though many times e-beggars often made better videos before they started the practice.

    I am surprised YouTube even tolerates e-begging at all. Most websites and forums will ban people for doing it. Advertisers pay good money on many sites (such as YouTube) and they generally get turned off by the sight of random users spamming and asking for money.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @InfidelAvenger That's probably true. I can see lazy people like TJ or Cody Weber doing it, but Lee's a lawyer and he works for a Washington DC think tank. I get the easy money aspect of it. If putting up a single link can get you even a few hundred dollars from thousands of subscribers, why not do it? What I can't understand is why subscribers of channels tolerate it.

  • @InfidelAvenger, good job calling out Lee Doren's hypocrisy on ebegging.

    ThunderF00t called out Lee for eBegging in his very FIRST video, THE incentive Lee himself notes for creating his channel. After being called on it, Lee quickly took down that first video, but the clip survives here CIlDlQO9n3A at 0:20

  • @VegasBilgeRat, LOL you just posted "3 fucking" posts, near maximum length each.

    1) A mosque is for prayer only. No basketball court, etc. By your definition the Pentagon is a mosque because it has Islamic prayer rooms

    2) By your logic ground zero extends to everything owned by anyone killed. Fact is the building wasn't destroyed

    3) Problem with any of Olbermann's points? Be specific. You can't.

    4) 5) Freedom of relgion

    You say "crammed to the brimm with hate"? Quote something. You can't.

  • LOL, you ask, Whats with the hate because she's a liberal?

    You just posted 3 fucking videos, 15 minutes long each, all crammed to the brimm with hate towards conservatives....

    Hypocrite much?

  • The way you pigeon hole conservatives makes everything else you say not worth listening to. I'm a conservative in 90% of issues, and I'm not racist. I know many conservatives, and they're not racist.

    The names you mentioned, Sarah Palin, Rush, Glenn, ....I double dare you to find ONE racist comment, (and it better be legit, there are loads of lies about what these people have said. If you can't back it up, don't mention it)

  • Point #1) news flash, a muslim prayer center is a mosque

    Point #2) the building was hit by plane wreckage from 9/11...that makes it ground zero as much as the other buildings close by

    Point #3) you're actually using Olbermann to make your points? rofl

    Point #4) Freedom is irrelevant here. There are many things that you CAN do, but you shouldn't. Bigotry is not the issue.

    Point#5) how can you ignore the significance for the proposed NAME of the mosque? Its a conquered triumph

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more