Lecture 4 | Programming Methodology (Stanford)

Lecture by Professor Mehran Sahami for the Stanford Computer Science Department (CS106A). Professor Sahami moves into the history of computing and introduces the program Java.

CS106A is an Introduction to the engineering of computer applications emphasizing modern software engineering principles: object-oriented design, decomposition, encapsulation, abstraction, and testing. Uses the Java programming language. Emphasis is on good programming style and the built-in facilities of the Java language.

Complete Playlist for the Course:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list...

CS106A at Stanford Unversity:
http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs106a/

Stanford Center for Professional Development:
http://scpd.stanford.edu/

Stanford University:
http://www.stanford.edu

Stanford University Channel on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/stanford

• Category

  Education

[Tom Robert]

Mehran,

Currently I'm a freshman in college and my professors are knowledgeable but they don't make classes half a interesting a you. I watched all four lectures without yawning. Thank you Mehran and Stanford for doing this.

[Jacopo Scotti]

I LOVE THIS GUY

[zhiwei chen]

really wishing for higher video resolution

[pravinrj17]

Can we still use the console program if we were to compile it using Text editor? Thank you in advance.

[MrBlackspoon]

Wow, I like how he used that Heirarchy example of biology. Made it so simple to understand. Wish they did that 4 months ago at my Java classes in the Netherlands.

[SuSp3cT666]

well Eclipse does the compiling when you press the run button, so as far as the user is concerned you can very well say that eclipse is the compiler, since that is 1 of it's functions

[buggy89plm]

nice course

[Baljeet Singh]

You said @11:20 eclipse is a compiler, but it is a IDE having compiler built in to it

[Jesus Flores]

I miss Karel ;'(

[Alex Alien]

What Heidegger meant by Being was Obing what Heidegger meant by being-in-the-world was obing-in-the-world and then we realise the meaning of the silence that Heidegger had on the Holocaust was not about the annihilation of beings but about the annihilation of obings since 6,000,000 beings did not die in the Holocaust but only 6,000,000 obings died and so silence makes sense and becomes clear for Heidegger the silence was his rational response for 6,000,000 dead obings is 6,000,000 dead objects.

[MrSplodgeySplodge]

You have bloody well got to be kidding me.