Re-enactment of the attack on the Pentagon. Flight departs from Dulles, and then simulates Flight 77s 300 degree turn and impact of the SW facade of the Pentagon at 460 knots(540 mph).
@jichaelmackson1958 Strawman attack. Looking at the evidence with no biases and coming to the same conclusion as the government does not equate to always believing the government.
@MirageKSA well SORRY i dont know the facts as well as you, and im SORRY that i was a baby when it happened, AND do NOT expect me to now a lot about America, cause im Canadian!!! >:P
@Moron1958 LMGDAO!! I LOVE how you idiots get the Talk Radio version of a crash, NEVER do any more research, and then pretend you understand what happened.
1) NTSB report was clear and unambiguous. MANY light poles were hit. The wings were NOT ripped off
2) The first light pole caused a rupture in a fuel cell and a witness "saw an orange flame."
3) NWA 255 crashed NOT because it hit a light pole. But because (like Delta 191) the crew failed to set flap-slats correctly.
@Moron1958 Doesnt work that way retard. YOU claimed there were past incidences where a light pole was ripped off and the plane stopped dead, traveling less than .02 more seconds.
YOU have to show that example. YOU claimed it existed. No one else has to show you jack shit. lololol.
Show proof, or the claim is automatically retracted. =]
@EdgemanLL2 Show me a commercial jet that hits a light pole at high speed and has the part of the plane that hit the lightpole INTACT... you wont find any, because its impossible, at high speeds a plane that gets hit by a friggen PIGEON can put a hole in the wing. If you dont understand this simple fact then you are simply another dumbass american that believes their government. Dont reply unless its intelligent...
that is cool
MEtallica021319 1 month ago
@MirageKSA She meant United Airlines Flight 93.
starwarsfandude 2 months ago
@jichaelmackson1958 Strawman attack. Looking at the evidence with no biases and coming to the same conclusion as the government does not equate to always believing the government.
ThinkingCritically1 4 months ago
@MirageKSA hahaha you said that with compassion like,hey i hit the pentagon and reinacted one of americas most horrible tragedys lalollllolollolol
mongster7798 4 months ago
@MirageKSA well SORRY i dont know the facts as well as you, and im SORRY that i was a baby when it happened, AND do NOT expect me to now a lot about America, cause im Canadian!!! >:P
zombiegirl47 4 months ago
@zombiegirl47
It DID hit the pentagon you dumb ass.
MirageKSA 4 months ago
i can't imagine what would happen if the plane succeeded to crash the pentagon...
zombiegirl47 4 months ago
@Moron1958 LMGDAO!! I LOVE how you idiots get the Talk Radio version of a crash, NEVER do any more research, and then pretend you understand what happened.
1) NTSB report was clear and unambiguous. MANY light poles were hit. The wings were NOT ripped off
2) The first light pole caused a rupture in a fuel cell and a witness "saw an orange flame."
3) NWA 255 crashed NOT because it hit a light pole. But because (like Delta 191) the crew failed to set flap-slats correctly.
PWNED!!!!
EdgemanLL2 4 months ago
@Moron1958 Doesnt work that way retard. YOU claimed there were past incidences where a light pole was ripped off and the plane stopped dead, traveling less than .02 more seconds.
YOU have to show that example. YOU claimed it existed. No one else has to show you jack shit. lololol.
Show proof, or the claim is automatically retracted. =]
EdgemanLL2 4 months ago
@EdgemanLL2 Show me a commercial jet that hits a light pole at high speed and has the part of the plane that hit the lightpole INTACT... you wont find any, because its impossible, at high speeds a plane that gets hit by a friggen PIGEON can put a hole in the wing. If you dont understand this simple fact then you are simply another dumbass american that believes their government. Dont reply unless its intelligent...
jichaelmackson1958 4 months ago