Moon Hoax Theory Lies: Front Projection by Stanley Kubrick

Exposing lies of Moon Hoax Conspiracy Theorists who claim NASA used projected backgrounds to create illusion of open lunar surface in Apollo pictures and footage.
The technique allegedly used by NASA was Front Screen Projection system, which was adopted by Stanley Kubrick to film opening scenes of "2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY".
Hoax Believers quickly tied Kubrick with Moon Hoax Theory, but some also claim NASA used Rear Screen Projection technology.
This video debunks both insane theories which again demonstrate striking ignorance of Conspiracy Theorists who invented and promoted them.

For more information, please visit videos from Astrobrant2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNbeN_V_NNw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK3Jnl6Zyhk

and the following:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmSDnPvslnA

Forgive typo at 1:50. 3M screen name is Scotchlite, of course.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Moon
• landing
• hoax
• conspiracy
• theory
• NASA
• Apollo
• debunking
• Kubrick
• 2001
• Space
• Odyssey
• front
• rear
• screen
• projection
• system
• artificial
• background
• 3M
• Scotchlite

[2efnbad]

What a piss poor job you've made for your case. All of the images supposedly taken on the moon would have been exposed to space radiation and have been rendered useless. The cameras were not capable of protecting film from this radiation. Hasselblad the manufacturers of the stills camera have said they didn't modify the camera to protect the film from radiation.

America has decided to 'return' to the moon in the future? Why not now, if the 60-70's technology got there. It never happened.

[BlisterHiker]

@2efnbad

Radiation is not the subject here, but screen projection theory junk.

Anyway, if you know so much about space radiation, show me one scientific document which says specifically that radiation during Apollo missions must have made film useless, as you claim.

If you know it then there must be scientists somewhere in the world who know that even better than you.

Publication title, author(s) and date published, please, and remember, it must be relevant. It's not about Chernobyl.

[peyotecactus]

Forget the wires. You are obsessed with a detail nobody can prove. Try debunking the Neil Armstrong by the Window on Apollo 11 video. YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN THIS. Game over pal.

[BlisterHiker]

"You are obsessed with a detail nobody can prove."

@peyotecactus

Wrong! There are tons of evidence showing the astronauts were in the environment of 1/6 g gravity and vacuum. Hundreds of examples show that each time the astronauts kicked dust or throwed objects!

Check my videos about slow motion theory and lunar gravity. You will see some of very nice examples there.

Sorry, laws of physics and biomechanics do not lie. The astronauts were in the environment of the Moon.

>

[BlisterHiker]

@peyotecactus >

Armstrong by the window of Apollo 11? Are you telling me you believe that proven liar Sibrel and others who parroted those lies?

Sibrel has been caught lying so many times than only someone as ignorant and gullible as you could believe him!

Have you ever seen original, uncut footage from Apollo 11 transmissions? I doubt it.

Please watch these videos and try to digest them though it may be hard for you:

watch?v=ZHnGDFowHlY

watch?v=e6ikoUUCRyY

watch?v=GTUMjlD-7z0

>

[BlisterHiker]

@peyotecactus >cont

watch?v=8-kycXHTYco

watch?v=WOJ2FiCn-L0

Watch how conspiracy liars like Jarrah White contradict themselves!

watch?v=ETUi4jMDjkw

Watch another example showing how Sibrel lies: watch?v=x55yan1Tzmc

Watch this comparison between Apollo 11 TV footage and picture of hurricane Bernice taken by ESSA satellite on July 16 1969:

watch?v=d3qEoA35cLs

The evidence is overwhelming.

If you prefer liars like Sibrel and their bullshit, it's your choice. I prefer the truth.

[ProppaGannis]

Let's see, principal photography on 2001 started in Dec 1965. Final edits were done in April 1968. Filming for Clockwork was from Sept 1970 to April 1971. So hoaxters would have us believe he spent the time in between filming moon landings instead of promoting 2001 or doing pre-production for Clockwork. Right. The guy who rarely left his house since 1959. Sure. Let's just ignore the fact that Doug Trumbull, Geoff Unsworth, Tom Howard were talent that helped Kubrick create his imagery.

[BlisterHiker]

@MrTommYYZ >1

Thanks for exactly the kind of answer I expected.

You don't know what NASA had, but you know it was secret and it did exactly what you would like to see. Very logical way of thinking...

It always amazes me how people like you build their "reality" around the needs of their theories. From one side, NASA had some advanced technology that nobody ever saw, but then, according to ignorants like you, they didn't even have computer to take the astronauts to the Moon!

>

[BlisterHiker]

@peyotecactus

When you have something meaningful, like even one shred of evidence, let everybody know.

In the meantime, I trust my own education and what 99.99% of scientific and engineering community agrees about.

I have a quote for you too:

"Not believing stories that have no evidence to support them is good for your mental health."

(C) eventcone

[peyotecactus]

“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”

[BlisterHiker]

@joeneway

If only you showed even one shred of evidence for that trash you posted instead of insulting me, that would be something!

Sorry, evidence speaks for itself. Apollo missions were real.

9/11 was an act of terrorism and official story is real. There was no "magic bullet" that killed JFK. It was motion of his body and position of bones which caused wounds to appear that way.

It is no surprise to see another conspiracy nut behaving that way. I don't tolerate such behavior. Bye.

[joeneway]

Another fool thats brainwashed and programmed by our govt,keep them eyes shut and continue being one of the sheeple,let me guess 9/11 was an act of terrorist and Kennedy was killed by a magic bullet and nobody can tell or show you otherwise