Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Digital Learning Now: Element #8- Assessment & Accountability

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
177 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 19, 2011

Student learning is the metric for evaluating the quality of content and instruction.

Actions for lawmakers and policymakers:
• State administers assessments digitally.
• State ensures a digital formative assessment system.
• State evaluates the quality of content and courses predominately based on student learning data.
• State evaluates the effectiveness of teachers based, in part, on student learning data.
• State holds schools and providers accountable for achievement and growth.

Administering tests digitally has multiple benefits. Tests can be administered and scored quickly and efficiently. Computerized scoring provides the opportunity for a cost effective method to create better tests beyond multiple choice, including simulations and constructed responses. Getting the result of tests faster can improve instruction as well as expedite rewards and consequences, which can strengthen accountability for learning.

Learning management systems, digital curriculum, and online summative and formative assessments have the distinctive capability of collecting real-time data on the progress of each student against learning objectives. Instant feedback for students and personalized analytics for teachers provide the support for continuous improvement and competency-based progress.

Outcomes matter. States should hold schools and online providers accountable using
student learning to evaluate the quality of content or instruction. Providers and programs that are poor performing should have their contracts terminated.

History has proven that inputs, such as teacher certification, programmatic budgets and textbook reviews, do not guarantee a quality education. In fact, these regulatory processes often stifle innovation and diminish quality. Policymakers should resist attempts to create a checklist of inputs and, instead, focus on developing an accountability framework that is based on outcomes.

While conversion to digital assessments requires an initial investment, transitioning to a digital system can save money in the long run.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more