E-Flite UMX Extra 300 Flight!
Uploader Comments (earthling1984)
Top Comments
-
@wolfxx66 Ok... Not to be rude... but... The 4-site, and this plane, are very capable, and very well made planes. It is not the fault of the company if the pilot is not experienced enough to fly them and they break them. These planes are for intermediate to advanced flyers. They are not beginner planes. 3D planes are for people who are fully comfortable with 4ch planes - meaning, you can do normal & inverted flight, rolls, loops, snap rolls, knife edges, etc, without even thinking.
-
THIS plane is FANTASTIC I flew my friends and compared to the um 4-site, It is 20 times nicer to fly
All Comments (64)
-
I ordered one last week. Getting real anxious for it to get here. Fun Fun. Still working with the Blade MCPX and loving it. On a sad note I crashed my Big Lama into a tree. Bummer. Broke the tail boom off. Thanks for the video. (Tom)
-
oh yeah i can fly just as well as these guys, ill consider it
-
@Blueberry954 in my experience it is just as durable as the 4site.
-
ive seen this thing, it looks like if you crashed it it couldnt be repaired. i think ill go with a 4site
I'm using the electronics from this to make a TechOne mini Yak-54.
Kpilot786457 1 month ago
@Kpilot786457 cool I have a techone mini piaget
earthling1984 1 month ago
so--- this vs 4 site for experienced pilots?
Kpilot786457 4 months ago
@Kpilot786457 I would go with the UMX 300. I enjoy it a bit more than the 4-site myself, it seems more capable to me.
earthling1984 4 months ago
@earthling1984 all they have is paper with strips of foam!
Blueberry954 4 months ago
@Blueberry954 yes, and? damage on this plane was always minimal and never any major damage was done unless the pilot had a fast nose in crash or flew into a tree or something. I know it looks fragile, I was worried of that as well, but if you can fly, this plane is awesome, and I would definetely recommend it over the 4-site in terms of flight performance and fun.
earthling1984 4 months ago