@bjbjbzz fact still remains that they did have the world best time for a while which is some achievment for lightweights, like i said im not disagreeing im just stating fact.
Not hard to figure that one. Look at the flags at the start line and compare them to the flags in the background of the LM4- start. Headwinds make a big difference. Comparing times isn't realistic at all. The same boat could go 45 seconds slower in a headwind vs tailwind. To answer your question, yes, I can believe the lightweights went faster, on the same course, but not at the same time.
i love the ocean
malindavanderwal 1 month ago
@bjbjbzz fact still remains that they did have the world best time for a while which is some achievment for lightweights, like i said im not disagreeing im just stating fact.
srsly101 10 months ago
@srsly101 They weren't head to head with the fastest heavy 4 ever, so im not convinced. Oh and main words are "Used to"
bjbjbzz 10 months ago
@bjbjbzz with these athletes yes. but the danes light four used to have the overall world record for fours, not disagreeing, just stating fact.
srsly101 10 months ago
@huskyrower Without a doubt though, if they went head to head the Lights would lose.
bjbjbzz 1 year ago
pinsent <3
bazza1223345 1 year ago
there quite some wind, thats probably the reason there slower than the awesome lw
blukkes 1 year ago
@huskyrower
wow i never thaught of that
thanks for the reminder
rowing is by far the best sport ever in my opinion
TheCarDude1 2 years ago
Not hard to figure that one. Look at the flags at the start line and compare them to the flags in the background of the LM4- start. Headwinds make a big difference. Comparing times isn't realistic at all. The same boat could go 45 seconds slower in a headwind vs tailwind. To answer your question, yes, I can believe the lightweights went faster, on the same course, but not at the same time.
huskyrower 2 years ago
omg can you believe it the lightweight was faster than the heavyweight at 6.01
i never thought of that
TheCarDude1 2 years ago