Why Do People Laugh at Creationists? (Thunderf00t tribute) - HD version

Another HD version of a previous video.

Thunderf00t's channel: http://www.youtube.com/Thunderf00t

"Why Do People Laugh at Creationists?" playlist: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AC3481305829426D

Stupid video I'm debunking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haadES6pDZw

Category:

Education

Tags:

• creation
• creationism
• evolution
• debunk
• sun
• life
• origin
• thunderf00t

[SuperPais]

(Some) people laugh at creacionists, cause they are dumb and haters (the ones who laugh, of course)

Not one of them, could explain the evolution theory, for sure.

[shanedk]

@SuperPais I got a whole book and TONS of videos explaining it. Deal with it.

[NevilleRhysBarnes]

Lots of good points made in this video. Spike Psarris exemplifies the bankruptcy of the god-of-the-gaps position--he claims, for example, that we don't know why Mercury is so dense, and this gets twisted into "therefore God made it and the solar system didn't evolve". Not, "Let's research Mercury's density, and expand our knowledge of this fantastic universe."

The research will be done. The high density will be explained. And the gap will close tighter still on Spike Psarris's meagre soul.

[GuitarMannnnnn]

@SuperPais

Or... we can explain it via the theory of natural and artificial selection, thank you very much. But hey. You're right... we're the haters because we laugh. Meanwhile religious people feel the resentment and satisfaction of contemplating the suffering and agony of unbelievers in hell: that's perfectly okay because it's unspoken. Oh but laughing at silly beliefs, that's totally just us being haters, sorry 'bout that.

[ShawnRavenfire]

All you really have to do is look at the moons of the outer planets. They receive very little sunlight and are heated almost enitrely by geothermal vents.

[1tabligh]

@Fireflygamer The very nature of matter refuses permanence, eternity and continuity, for it can never separate itself from movement, relativity, and it stands in opposition to being a prime or absolute agent.

[Fireflygamer]

@1tab your ether an idiot or a troll. you keep talking about matter and I keep asking you how matter could exist before the big bang with out space and time, you keep assuming that the laws of physics as well as time and space itself could have worked very differently, to the point that nothing we know would apply anymore. faced with that I say IDK, but you say you are sure, with no evidence to back it up what so ever. believe in god if you want, don't pretend you have evidence for him

[1tabligh]

@Fireflygamer Eternity is incompatible with the mode of being possessed by matter and the factors and attributes necessitated by its nature. The belief of those who have faith in God concerning a fixed and absolute principle relates to a being who in and of his nature can accept stability and absoluteness; his nature is completely devoid of and remote from the properties of matter. 

[Fireflygamer]

@1tabligh your right, the problem is that again you are not listening to me. you are right in this universe with these sets of laws of physics were time and space exist. What if all this stuff that matter and energy exists in a place before the big bang that had no space and time. Can you open your mind for a second and imagine what a place like that would be like, if you can you will realize how stupid your assumptions about causality are. I'm tired, your not listening, good night.

[1tabligh]

@Fireflygamer Eternity means stability and immutability of essence, the impossibility of cessation, but matter/energy is in its essence a compendium of forces and potentialities; it is relativity itself, totally caught up in living and dying.



[Fireflygamer]

@1tabli FOR THE LAST TIME, BEFORE THE BIG BANG, TIME AND SPACE DID NOT EXIST AS WE KNOW THEM, THE IDEA THAT SOMETHING HAPPENED IN A CAUSAL WAY BEFORE TIME EXISTED IS STUPIDITY. YOU ARE ASSUMING CAUSALITY WOULD EVEN APPLY. just admit that just like the rest of us you have no idea how the universe was created and you just choose to believe that a god did it because it makes you feel more comfortable and that you have an answer even though you have no way knowing if its true or not.

[Fireflygamer]

@1tabligh "Thus, the removal of God in no way solves the problem posed by eternal being." I will assume you meant universe not being, because otherwise your making no sense, just like the addition of a god dose not solve the problem of infinite regeneration. So if we say god is eternal why not skip a step and just say the universe is eternal. again your not reading my comments, the laws of physics and even time/space itself was not how we understand it now, you are assuming it was.