Zeitgeist - Transportation Of The Future
Uploader Comments (zeitgeistau)
Top Comments
-
@kenmiester23 but is it 'efficient' to use fuels.?. Wind, solar and wave energy is much more 'efficient' as we won't run out of it. It would not be 'PROFITABLE' to do it, because people who would invest in them will not get their money back! so shut up.
Video Responses
All Comments (18)
-
Do you know people that a rail for this maglev so costly that many countries scraped the project. It is though might work in crowded places as europe and japan. But not in sparsely populated places.
-
It may be efficient and I'm all for it, but wouldn't it take huge amount of energy to build these tubes? My guess is that it would take dekades to build one tunell from america to europa or asia + the continental plates could possible destroy the tunell when they move.
-
@kenmiester23 no brain
-
none of them are efficient or enviromentaly friendly you retard so research what your talking about this whole VP and green movment is a con do some home work fool find out about AGENDA21 and as for profit if there was money in hippy fuel then they would sell it wind turbines are very expensive to make , instal and maintan as for solar and waves ha not reliable enough esp for the energy consumption VP needs with all 7 billion people SO YOU SHUT UP FUCK WIT no cold fusion no VP no fancy train
-
BS its all BS if you listen to him anyone would think Enstien wasnt a pattern clerk and just sat around all day thinking his relativity thoughts or maybe he believes that issac Newton was asleep under the apple tree. he claims to know history but leaves out the real truth of Newton and Einstien to name but a few BALDERDASH is what best describes Jaque Frescoe's statments and philosophy
-
a quote from JF "communism is not radical enough for todays world. communism was good enough 20 years ago"
-
@TUBEFCUKyou i dont think profit is a fare measuring device as it doesnt give a true value try efficiency there are lots of ways to produce energy but it doesnt make sence to (using a finacial value) to spend $100 to get $1 back so with out a clean FREE source of energy (COLD FUSION) its all pie in the sky STARTREK type wishful thinking
-
@writereducator There are ways of collecting energy without using fuels :) they're just less profitable.
881 views shows the problem with getting opinions like this out in the general public. i totally agree with the ending statements.
jensonee 6 months ago 6
@jensonee 300 more since your comment ^^
zeitgeistau 5 months ago