Sonic and the Black Knight IGN REVIEW discussion in Nintendo Voice Chat Podcast

IGN's Matt Casamassina reviewed Sonic and the Black Knight, and he, Daemon Hatfield, Craig Harris and Mark Bozon discuss it in the newest Nintendo Voice Chat Podcast.

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• sonic
• black
• knight
• the
• hedgehog
• sega
• team
• king
• arthur
• of
• wind
• crush
• 40
• ign
• nintendo
• voice
• chat
• podcast
• matt
• casamassina
• mark
• bozon
• daemon
• hatfield
• craig
• harris

[LeonSKennedy828]

I disagree, I thought Unleashed (360) was the best Sonic game since Sonic Adventure 2, I did love Heroes none the less though.

I hated Shadow and Sonic 2006 :/

[BlazexShadow]

lol go sonic fan! IGN=epic fail!

[megatron0302]

No loops? What were these guy on?

[Visser0x]

@crazy4guitar3000 It be a huge spoiler to find out who the final boss is in this game, seeing as said final boss helped you in the begining while the black kinght was seemingly the main villian.

[crazy4guitar3000]

@Visser0x Again, I could care less WHEN the video was released. Their original written review on their site claimed that the Black Knight was the final boss, whereas he wasn't, that's the 50% mark. This is something known and why the Sonic fanbase claims the reviews are rushed. The irony is that you're defending IGN from claims you think they don't deserve, where we Sonic fans feel the exact same way, except with Sonic...

[Visser0x]

@crazy4guitar3000 The review wasn't rushed there is no proof what so ever that the review was rushed. reviewers get early copies of the game so that they can put out a review of it on the day of the release the put the same if not more amount of time in their reviews as anyone else.

[crazy4guitar3000]

@Visser0x Okay, focus with me. You seem to be intentionally swaying from the subject. The topic here was that the review was rushed, and IGN fucked up. I'm sorry, that part is not debatable. They could have said the game was great for all I care, but the time and effort (if you even want to call it that) they put into these are subpar and lackluster...

[Visser0x]

@crazy4guitar3000 They didn't make any mistakes, this game is not a great game nor is a it a good game its an ok game at best.

[crazy4guitar3000]

@Visser0x Totally. That must be why they only reviewed half the game. And after seeing their mistake, rather than say redoing the review, they just spliced in new video footage in their old one. Hot damn, now THAT is quality!

[crazy4guitar3000]

@IMADRWILY My point was that IGN's logic as a whole is flawed. Besides, I use to respect IGN, that was before this podcast where they went out of their way just to stick it Sonic fans. Very immature behavior for a "professional" company. Their reviews are rushed, inherently biased, can't play worth a damn, and have illogical scoring structures (Colors loses points for difficult sections? Epic fail). The saddest thing is that they get paid for this...

[IMADRWILY]

@crazy4guitar3000 they have different reviewers reviewing different games

IGN isn't one person.

[Visser0x]

@Hobnomb They din't rush, its just their opinion that this is a bad game.