Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: The 2nd Amendment = Dead women defending home

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,533
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 22, 2006

Conspiracy?? I don't think so.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (HurtlockerTwo)

  • 90 years old and dead by the police department man are you not proud to be an american were at least i know i am free to let anyone barge through my door at anytime and place huh hope it doesnt happen to you man lets put this in a way you can understand they have to show you the search warrant first if not then there is no legal way for them to do it man chek your constution before you blab something like that out!!!!!!!

  • This was recorded a few days after the incident before the facts were determined. All I said was don't assume the cops were guilty based on the hype. That goes both ways in constituiton, you should try reading it.

Top Comments

  • What are you wearing sunglasses? you arer are indoors.

  • Here's my two cents. On the subject of the police protecting you. Situation. Armed burglar breaks into your house. You don't own a gun, so you call the cops. Bad guy is trashin your house, stubles on you, pops you twice in the head with your phone to your ear. 10-15 minutes later the police arrive. Nuff-said. The police are here to "clean up" crime...literally...clean up after it. When life and death is timed in seconds, your police officers are 10 minutes away.

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I agree with you 100%. It’s not a conspiracy at all!

    They actually do it in broad daylight without fear of consequences!

    It’s a POLICY!

  • When seconds count, the police are only minutes away...

  • The police are under no obligation to protect you!

    Warren v. District of Columbia ...D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen" (Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981).

  • MAYBE, Just maybe at her age she could not hear so well! have been around people that old and their hearing is not so great! Someone shouting from behind a door can be hard to hear, Especially if you have a well insulated home, But the LOUD crashing in of a door she may have heard and being scared and not knowing what was going on, she did what every American should do! KILL THE BASTARDS! It is kind of a lose lose scenario! Some cops deserve to get shot tho! Watch the videos of A-hole cops!!!!

  • TJ also said if given the choice between government and newspaper, he will pick the latter. I am in agreement. I don't need police protection. Police aren't obligated to protect me anyway, they have already wrote that into law that they are not liable. I don't need that type if irresponsibility.

  • they said to open up its the police at least twice so wats the problem she was warned and she made the wrong disicion she acted as a vilent crimanil and was dealt with as 1

  • Ok? Quote Thomas Jefferson in a case of a criminal being gunned down by police, who were conducting business in accordance with policy. The police, though paid by the government, are those same "people" you are referring to. They aren't militia, they aren't military. They're citizens putting their lives on the line for your safety.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more