Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

911stealth Footage by Devin Clark Stored & Used by CNN CBS ABC on 9/11

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
21,359
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 11, 2008

More evidence of footage of 9/11 aired by multiple TV stations as it was being feed by the miliary "intelligence" ops-centre controlling the Mass Media of that Day: CNN, CBS, ABC (as it is written in the video description: WABC, however they lie when they say that it is without audio, the slowed "monster" audio is exactly as it is stored at CNN.)

"The more important point to me, is to bring into the light the fact - and it is a fact - that a combination of big government and very big international corporations have been and are intruding into newsrooms and news coverage in ways they shouldn't be, because the result is an influence in news coverage to their own particular partisan, political, ideological or profit-making motives. And the public needs to know about this." Dan Rather. Januray 20, 2008, Zest. P. 12.
(Rather's current program: "Dan Rather Reports" on HDNet by Mark Cuban.)

The most frequent stored footage at CNN is the farther view of the same clip captured by Devin Clark and aired worldwide in question of seconds by the BlackOps opcentre perpetrators:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWsBrl34V-E

To learn more about Devin Clark and his darkness:
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2367&st=0

This is another shot highly similar to the "works" of Devin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSxHd0iRPSM

Here, we check the stored footage by Devin Clark at CNN, which was aired multiple times (as well as later on by PBS, documentary: "New York Center of the World"). It is clear that it was aired as it is stored: at a lower speed to increase its psychological impact. However, we can see that the E-4B was also recorded and it can be clearly seen, as well as the "dual orb" filmed by many other videos can be seen just after the big explosion (DiPilato, NBC, Discovery Channel's documentary: "Inside the Twin Towers"...)

More details on Devin Clark and his deceptios at: http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

Another thing to notice is the deliberate attempt by CNN to make very hard to find its 9/11 videos, they deliberately labek them with the wrong date: 10-SEP-2001.

Also Devin declares that he provided his footage for CNN, however we see that also CBS and ABC aired it under the supervision of the "intel" military media manipulators.

Main info. taken from:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktXsWNTxJ0E

Also see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DopaHxL8zu0

Further evidence of the "plane" fakery:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaMfLEKcjc4

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (911stealth2)

  • My friend 911stealth2 says CNN

    'deliberately labek them with the wrong date: 10-SEP-2001'

    I would disagree and suggest that the date on the left (10-SEP-2001) is the date they got the video or that it was actually recorded.

    I am absolutely sure the WNYW HIGH5 segment was prerecorded and that much more was as well.

  • Even the speech of Bush at the Booker Elementary School at Florida was dated as 10-SEP-2001 while the events taking place on September 12th at CNN have the date of 11-SEP-2001, which is a deliberate confusion.

  • cool.

    I hate to sound paranoid, but, do you really think he was at Booker on 911?

    Sort of like the planted parts issue; once we discover a planted part, how can we confirm the other parts might be real?

    They faked what they showed us on 911. Where was the line drawn? Did Andrew Card know what he was shown wispering into dubya's ear?

  • watch?v=PBJvN_IYzJI

    &

    watch?v=hvYqRTPtrNc

    People indeed died, towers indeed demolished. Every detail only known to the perps. Avanced aircraft and military choppers in disguise were flying all over the 9/11 events.

    We can not deny every piece of footage, rather we compare it with other to conclude which things match and which things lack of correspondence, like those discrepancies in the "planes" aired first and filmed by multiple perps on 9/11.

Top Comments

  • who the fuck says "holy cow" in new york city?

  • The laws of physics for idiots - 1) aluminum and compressed air cannot fully pennetrate concrete and steel ay ANY speed 2) max speed for a 767 at 700 feet altitude is 250 mph, not 550 (call boeing yourself) 3) the fake "planes" melt into the WTC and explode on the opposite side (no deceleration and no sound of impact) 4)16 different aircraft and 9 different approach paths in 24 seperate videos If you believe this stupid-ass story, you are no better than the motherfuckers who did this.

see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I NOTICED MANY HOVERING "HELICOPTERS" DURING THE POINT OF IMPACTS AND SHORTLY THEREAFTER,HOWEVER I ALSO NOTICED THE LACK OF ROTARY BLADES AND MANY "FLASH IN THE PAN" STREAKS ACROSS THE SKY ON TELEVISION. look at any footage and you will also see hovering objects watching history in the making. THERE'S ALSO A CLIP OF AN ANGEL LANDING ON THE TOP OF AN ANTENNA WATCHING PEOPLE JUMP OUT OF BUILDINGS- IF ANYONE KNOWS OF THIS VIDEO LET ME KNOW (the angel is translucent in appearance). he's there.

  • at 4min u can see another airplane in the upper right

  • @sixdgrs

    Yes, people using logical fallacy and sophisticated terminology which they can't even justify is very irritating, such as "These planes were simply visual and audible illusions created by highly exotic weapon technology in the form of orbs.." and if you ask them what they mean by exotic, and ask them to describe this "orb" they can do neither, which makes their point completely void unless they have an explanation.

  • @MarijuanaMichelle what are you smokin' MarijuanaMichelle?

  • @Ethanace I think I may have misread your initial response, lol. I thought you were implying that the planes should have bounced off the buildings like most of these truthers think. Perhaps we're on the same side here. I believe planes hit the the WTC (OMG, seriously! I must be crazy, right?).

    It's amazing how people misuse newton's law and pythagorean theorem and suddenly the uneducated call it a conspiracy.

  • @sixdgrs

    I could ask you the same question, lol. What are you getting at by pointing out that this bomber almost fully penetrated the Empire State Building as it's parts came out and landed elsewhere?

  • @Ethanace also true. Where are you going with this?

  • @sixdgrs

    And multiple parts of debris from the jets that hit the twin towers was also scattered across the streets of New York City blocks away from the World Trade Center.

  • @Ethanace true. Although it was much smaller plane traveling at much lower speed. And "funnily enough", one of the engines of that plane completely penetrated the building and landed on a rooftop of a building to the south. Google it.

  • 3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more