Moon Landing Hoax - Collins Leaves Mark on Camera

http://moonmovie.com

Astronauts Gone Wild - Michael Collins

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• collins
• apollo
• 11
• fake
• hoax

[tracyterry]

mike collins is cool

[UnlovedChassis]

its funny, all the non-engineering/science types don't believe in the moon landings. if you have an ounce of legitimate education in math and physics you can understand how REAL the moon landings are. Good luck in life, arts students.

[scottson2]

to Suddenly: what about the rock that was given to the other country rep that turned out to be petrified wood.. there is a YT video showing jarred asking Buzz directly about it and buzz saying that somone tampered with it before it was gifted...,but still sealed in the original NASA presentation plaque.

[MadHighway]

@suddenlyitsobvious

There's no way to fake a lunar rock--we can't make them here on Earth. And before you say lunar rocks found on Earth could be substituted, that's impossible. A lunar meteorite would show signs of atmospheric heating and terrestrial contamination. Apollo samples were placed in boxes and sealed on the lunar surface to preserve them in a vacuum.

There is not one reputable scientist or engineer who spouts the things you do. Not ONE--why is that? Answer.

[MadHighway]

@suddenlyitsobvious

I don't know why I'd post this to someone so myopic as to think that scientific study itself is predicated on lies (but at least we're getting to the root of your paranoia).

Anyway: the USSR tracked and confirmed Apollo manned missions to the moon.

Anyway: lunar rock fragments are sometimes fall to Earth, thus we can compare them to Apollo samples; lunar rock is rather different than terrestrial rock owing to different formative processes. Got it?

[MadHighway]

@suddenlyitsobvious

You continually pile conjecture atop misperception atop yet more conjecture. None of what you say about the Apollo program is backed up by any reputable science or engineering journal or personnel.

Your case is based solely on your misperceptions, mistrustfulness, your personal opinion, and your overweening sense of pride; nobody can convince otherwise.

Classic bulletproof paranoiac setup. There are peer-reviewed studies on YOUR mindset.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@MadHighway

'Independent authorities'

Such as?

'Lunar rock sample'

And how does the legit university ascertain the soil/rock sample is lunar?

Please detail the protocol.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@MadHighway

'Please present sourced, peer-reviewed facts of science to prove your case'

Pfft. Another substandard, completely mindlessly unspecific line.

What contention of mine requires a peer-reviewed paper in your opinion?

[MadHighway]

@suddenlyitsobvious

Blahblahblahblather.

Please present sourced, peer-reviewed facts of science to prove your case instead of trying to prove how cutting-edge and individualistic you are.

I'll ignore the unrelated and irrelevant issues you bring up; obviously you have a deep-seated paranoia involving 'authority'.

Independent authorities tracked and confirmed manned US spacecraft at the moon. Any legit university can apply for a lunar soil/rock sample.

Stay on-task.

[MadHighway]

@suddenlyitsobvious

Now let's get on to your major intellectual typos and paranoiac hysteria.

[MadHighway]

@suddenlyitsobvious

Yes, I graduated with a degree, and you're still down there in kindergarten. We're still awaiting all your peer-reviewed facts of science, and you still keep posting your gut-level, miseducated fallacies.

Isaac Asimov wrote on the dangers of hysterical crusaders like you. Crusaders of ignorance. Go learn some science and look up treatments for 'paranoia'--because you are an hysterical paranoiac.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@MadHighway

Face it: your posts are substandard. We're not in the same league. Bye now.