Samuel Beckett - Endgame (Part 4)
Loading...
10,166
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (12)
-
@whattheflimflam That's exactly what I'm doing :)
-
@daescentdan yeah, i think i agree
-
@zausS4L It is absurdist, but it is about understanding, becuase everyone can interpret it differently and have their own opinions about it.
-
i have a tma so i have to study it can any bady imagen that waaaa3
-
I wonder if Ingmar Bergman was influenced by Samuel Beckett.
-
There needs to be more energy in the stage performance of this thing.
-
Back again with the "PHILIP" Glass... :D
-
@whattheflimflam Understanding is not the objective of this play. It is meaningless - there is no understanding to be found. It's absurdist, a product of the existentialist viewpoint.
-
this is the biggest load of wank ive ever seen
Loading...
This is awesome. I am reading Endgame and I like watching this to help me understand the play better.
whattheflimflam 2 years ago 7
"What in God's name could be on the horizon?"
RKM52925 1 year ago