This video of Cindy Sheehan speaking in San Francisco was taken on March 16, 2008. It is part of a larger report on the "Five Years Too Many" anti-war event, which can be found at http://www.zombietime.com/five_years_too_many/
If one of your family members is murdered and you argue to bring back the death penalty your argument is not strengthened by the fact someone you knew was murdered, in fact its probably weakened as you are not in a stable stated of mind. My point is even though Cindy Sheehan's son was killed it doesnt give her greater moral authority over anyone. What happened to her son was awful but it unfortunately doesn't make her right.
You're comparing your own conspiracy theorizing about Cindy Sheehan with the empirical truth that has been documented on hundreds of occasions? (Haditha just to name one)
Btw, you have made some even more serious accusations against the U.S. military, the Berkeley police, and Christians who run programs for helping the poor in your various other posts without offering any proof to back them. Seems a bit like the pot calling the kettle black.
If it was the "Hippies" comment, I admit I overreacted. It's no different from your own strategy, however.
Oh, and how is it a "Bizarre, baseless conspiracy theory" to be a just a little bit suspicious of Sheehan claiming that Casey was suddenly a peacenik objector to the war based on a single mysterious email that she claimed she just happened to receive the day before her speech (Quite convenient that it happened to arrive right then, no?), without offering any other proof to back it up?
Also, if you think taunting people over misuse of the English language and evident ignorance of basic facts that can be confirmed by reading any (even CIA and Pentagon authored)foreign policy report, you obviously are just thin skinned and lack confidence in yourself.
See, here's my beef with you. On one hand, you claim I contribute nothing to the debate because I just throw insults around (quite a convenient way to ignore any of the core principals of my argument, such as the validity of the way and the hypocrisy of America's foreign policy), yet, you make childish, juvenile insults and assert bizarre, baseless conspiracy theories.
Words like hypocrite do not suffice to describe you
Did it ever occur to you that maybe Sheehan was lying to make the audience think that Casey felt the same way as her about the war? She claims she got all that info from a mysterious, anonymous email that she claims she just happened to have received the day before. She offers zero proof of her assertions beyond that one questionable email that she says she just received. I guess she's hoping that all the hippies and college students watching her are too stoned to question what she said.
what a marxist idiot. She is a marxist
RRNYC1998 3 years ago
If one of your family members is murdered and you argue to bring back the death penalty your argument is not strengthened by the fact someone you knew was murdered, in fact its probably weakened as you are not in a stable stated of mind. My point is even though Cindy Sheehan's son was killed it doesnt give her greater moral authority over anyone. What happened to her son was awful but it unfortunately doesn't make her right.
freshhell 3 years ago
You're comparing your own conspiracy theorizing about Cindy Sheehan with the empirical truth that has been documented on hundreds of occasions? (Haditha just to name one)
Yeah, good comeback -rolls yes-
zahidizhang00 3 years ago
Btw, you have made some even more serious accusations against the U.S. military, the Berkeley police, and Christians who run programs for helping the poor in your various other posts without offering any proof to back them. Seems a bit like the pot calling the kettle black.
Adamguy2003 3 years ago
Just saying the circumstances are a bit suspicious, that's all.
Adamguy2003 3 years ago
You are claiming that she lied. Thats a serious accusation and you have no proof whatsoever to back that inane theory.
zahidizhang00 3 years ago
If it was the "Hippies" comment, I admit I overreacted. It's no different from your own strategy, however.
Oh, and how is it a "Bizarre, baseless conspiracy theory" to be a just a little bit suspicious of Sheehan claiming that Casey was suddenly a peacenik objector to the war based on a single mysterious email that she claimed she just happened to receive the day before her speech (Quite convenient that it happened to arrive right then, no?), without offering any other proof to back it up?
Adamguy2003 3 years ago
Also, if you think taunting people over misuse of the English language and evident ignorance of basic facts that can be confirmed by reading any (even CIA and Pentagon authored)foreign policy report, you obviously are just thin skinned and lack confidence in yourself.
zahidizhang00 3 years ago
See, here's my beef with you. On one hand, you claim I contribute nothing to the debate because I just throw insults around (quite a convenient way to ignore any of the core principals of my argument, such as the validity of the way and the hypocrisy of America's foreign policy), yet, you make childish, juvenile insults and assert bizarre, baseless conspiracy theories.
Words like hypocrite do not suffice to describe you
zahidizhang00 3 years ago
Did it ever occur to you that maybe Sheehan was lying to make the audience think that Casey felt the same way as her about the war? She claims she got all that info from a mysterious, anonymous email that she claims she just happened to have received the day before. She offers zero proof of her assertions beyond that one questionable email that she says she just received. I guess she's hoping that all the hippies and college students watching her are too stoned to question what she said.
Adamguy2003 3 years ago