Collateral 45-To secede, or not to secede
Top Comments
All Comments (10)
-
i smell bullshit. As a black man this sound like more bullshit nationalistic racism using those evil exploiting corporations as just an excuse to justify these peoples true intentions. And the league of the south is not supposedly racist ya morons it is racist. Have u not read the articles they published? No they don't want to enslave us black folk they jus want to send us back to africa is all!
-
The league of the south is not bad so what if they want a biblical nation
-
The question is irrelevant and completely beside the point. It presumes that secession will enable the preservation of certain moral or democratic values. I've already stated why that would not work. The state would be even easier to control by outside forces. Vermont would soon become a U.S. colony. It does absolutely nothing to democratize the U.S. or prevent U.S. imperialism.
-
oh no its the boogyman!!!
-
An autarchic, tiny state is reactionary nonsense. It would either be easier to control by international capital or would de-evolve to a bunch of loner rednecks. It would do nothing to end war, poverty, world hunger and would be unable to develop technologically. Please continue to stick your head in the sand and not care about the rest of the world. What a joke.
Secession had never occurred to me. That is a very interesting proposition for any one being laid upon (and that group includes many people, I'm sure) by an ever growing group of multinational corporations.
I wonder if the birthplace of the USA would be interested in seceding :P
leaddiet 3 years ago 4
YES secede from the union!!! I am sick and tired of all the corruption in washington that I have to pay for!!! They dont want us to get out because then they cant control us and enslave us!!! Fuck the globalist and their NWO!!! Give me liberty or give me death!!!
Re3volution 3 years ago