1936 Cord vs. 1934 Cadillac V-16

Please Subscribe!
Would you rather have a 1936 Cord or a 1934 Cadillac V-16? (I might have to go with the Cadillac). Please vote below and/or bost positive comments/feedback below this video. Thanks!
There was one man standing around me that had some dirty language at one point, so that's why I say "Sorry about that language". If you wish to not hear the language at all, put the video on rather low volume. Thanks and I apologize.
TIP: FOR BETTER PICTURE QUALITY, MAKE SURE YOU CLICK ON "WATCH IN HIGH QUALITY" BELOW THIS VIDEO.
Please Subscribe!

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• old
• car

[jgant2008]

cadillac

[youmils03]

@jgant2008 agreed

[estesoyojajaja]

@youmils03 my ass is better.

[youmils03]

@estesoyojajaja nahhhh i don't think so

[spataprengel]

learn to handle the camera... please

[youmils03]

@spataprengel lol sorry.. i was in like 7th grade wen i was shooting that video so ya.. but try to be positive wen critiquing my video

[immuki]

v-16 had about 142 HP and weighed 1,500 pounds, if i am correct

[shyml1]

If it was a 1930 series 452 Cadillac V-16 it was a no match, with the V-16 clear leader. However the later v-16, 1934 on, has a completely different engine and is not very interesting. So in your two choices the Cord wins. Not all V-16's are created equal.

[harriswa]

i pick the cord

[ReggyRay289]

My dad has got two '34 v16's one a coupe the other four door convertible. Both went to Pebble Beach. The convertible went twice, once as just a running chassis the other as a complete car. Both are black. Just so you know those are the wrong bumpers, those are off of a '35, '34's had "biplane" bumpers.

[Shubba2529]

Cord without a doubt ! The one thing the Caddy has that makes it attractive is the rare powerplant.