Danny Jowenko 9/11 interview WTC 7 [An Unwilling Truther Guru]

This video clip is from a Dutch 9/11 documentary featuring Danny Jowenko's interviews concerning the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7.

In this clip, Danny Jowenko talks about WTC 7.
-------------------------------------------
Full documentary streaming here:

http://cgi.omroep.nl/cgi-bin/streams?/tv/vara/zembla/bb.20060911.asf
Zembla - Investigates 9/11 Broadcast by Dutch TV 9/11/06

-------------------------------------------

Danny Jowenko's WTC 1 and 2 interview clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrJH8nLO8kc

----------------------------
RIP Danny Jowenko.
----------------------------

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• danny
• jowenko
• 9/11 truthers
• wtc 7
• wtc 1
• wtc 2
• inside job
• demolition
• nwo
• shill
• crazy
• conspiracy theories
• world
• tower
• september
• news
• interview
• twin
• footage

[danp5648]

at 17:16 in the uncut version watch?v=0ZyCCpXNPbw he DOES NOT REPLY in the way you say he does. He reply was "for me it is little bit watching coffee dregs" which I have no idea what he means.

[911SanityandRespect]

@danp5648 Well, if you kept watching, Jowenko explains what he means by 'for me it is a little bit watching coffee dregs'. He says it RIGHT AFTER.

"I mean, that is not a lot of information"

So what do you mean by 'he does not reply in the way you say he does'?

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

[911SanityandRespect]

@ctcole77 3 of many questions truthers don't want you to ask them lol.

[UK31337]

I should add that his opinions are based on one very short video clip which has been edited to support the truthers' position. I've seen other footage and independent photographs taken from across the Hudson River which shows the front of WTC7 gouged out and the building leaning forwards.

WTC7 collapsed basically because the internal structure failed horizontally and the walls were unsupported. The low booms beforehand were probably part of the internal structure crashing to the ground.

[UK31337]

Yup, the Danny Jowenko WTC7 comments are always taken out of context. The short clip the truthers keep showing you misrepresents his opinions and what he actually said.

Then he goes and dies in a tragic but perfectly easy to explain car accident and people claim he was silenced by the CIA because he spoke out. What absolute nonsense - plenty of other people have made the exact same claims and are still alive.

[Weirdo10o4]

Leave out the east penthouse... no wonder he thought it was a controlled demolition. Leave out the fact it caused 1.7 billion in damages to other structures and that it didn't collapse evenly.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect yet, the building was built to stand the impact of an aircraft of such, why not tell that to the first responders that were down there and saw it with their own eyes, they even stated that there was melted flowing steel down there ?!?!?!?

[911SanityandRespect]

@sr71ablackbird Yet again, a truther babbles on about 'melting steel'.

And yet again, someone has to tell them that no one claims the steel melted. The steel had lost half its strength due the fires, which started from a really big plane smashing into the building (which of course caused much structural damage to begin with).

The steel did not need to melt. So stop talking about melted steel. It has nothing nothing to do with 9/11.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect over 3000 F to melt steel, far from what you have described, and you would known that if you had paid attention to what i have stated before. go back, read and read it. How do I know all of this? I learned this from experience based in a foundry in a metal shop and members of the Air Force. K-2 Kerosene, would NOT get hot enough to melt that steel, let alone the aluminum that of which the aircraft was made of. Just be lucky that the fuel that was mentioned was NOT JP-8

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect and you should do your metallurgy some more. If you have ever spent any time at a foundry at all, then you would know was well as i do, it would take what is called a 'controled envoriment' to do that, & NOT an open-air enviroment. At the least, it takes 2700+ in a controlled enviroment just to melt aluminum which the temperature is measured by what is called a pyrometer which is inserted into what is called a graphite crucible which the aluminum is melted in. It takes ...