Crysis Very High 1680x1050 Radeon HD4870
Uploader Comments (BorkaBonum)
Top Comments
-
To show the native performance. As Fraps doesn't capture 1:1 realtime performance as it'll need a chunk of resources itself.
-
can u see a big difference in the graphics between a 1280x720 42" lg tv and a 1280x1024 18" monitor ?
which whould i use to play games on the computer im buying ? AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (quad 3.4ghz) Foxconn 6100M61-PMV (6x USB2.0, Onboard GeForce video) 4GB DDR2 800mhz (2x 2GB) 500GB S-ATAII 3.0Gb/s 400W
in which of the above tv/monitor should i play? and in which will look better and would u guess how many fps i would get in each of them ? Thxxxxx
hope u reply =P
Video Responses
All Comments (669)
-
@IRGUYProductions thanks for the reply but now i know a lot about pc hardware lol, when i posted this i knew absolutely nothing ... and yeah .. it would run better on the tv because of the lower resolution but it wouldnt run crysis because that pc has a onboard gpu LOL
-
Believe it or not it would run better on the tv
-
@Shawek1337 no duuuuh than is your cpu a bottelneck but this combination is not a bottelneck :P
-
@mennogamer559 if you read the comment i made a reply to you will notice that i meant that you cant max out any game with a $1000 graphics card if you have a crappy cpu :P
-
@Ryanhelsby you can do it but your cpu is than the bottelneck
-
@Shawek1337 no the cpu is not a bottelneck
-
I have owned videocards from both companies, and IMO they both are good... All comes down to user preference.
-
@harritaco i belive it depends alot on the CPU also :)
-
just shows you dont need a $1000 graphics card to play with good graphics i have this graphics card and have no problems maxing out any game on it
if ppl get this with so weak cpu i wonder i get with my 4Ghz amd phenom II quardocre with this card lol
RDilus 1 year ago
The processor doesn't really contribute with alot of performance if the videocard isn't up to snuff. And looking back I doubt my CPU was a mentionable bottleneck as I only saw a minimal performance increase with my now close to one-year-old Phenom II X4 940BE even at 3,6ghz.
BorkaBonum 1 year ago
@BorkaBonum
pentium 4 + 5750 = 10 fps crisis
quad core 8300 + 5750 = 50+ fps crisis
ShervinGetOffMee 1 year ago
@ShervinGetOffMee
Bear in mind the Pentium 4 was absolute bullshit even when it was first produced, and single-core. And that Crysis is capping most videocards - which is the problem here. A buffed processor will benefit the performance - but only for as long as the GPU won't act as a severe bottleneck.
BorkaBonum 1 year ago
@BorkaBonum
lolz alrighty but p4 kicks ass :D its actually faster than my gaming pc right now, it just cant handle games, makes a fast office computer
ShervinGetOffMee 1 year ago
@ShervinGetOffMee
Nah. It has a high clock frequency, but the muscles behind them is just complete rubbish. It got completely raped by Athlon 64 which set the standard of desktop micro-processors ever since. Like - a Pentium 4 at 4ghz got handed by a Athlon 64 at slightly over 2ghz.
Pentium 4 was always shit. Caught on due to high availability and reasonably low prices - and for businesses basically becuase Intel has always played foul.
BorkaBonum 1 year ago