Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Bombardier Beetle 2

How the defense mechanism of the amazing bombardier beetle works.  
 
Customize

More From: sinankosak

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
54 ratings
Sign in to rate
29,995 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (106)   Options

Loading...
sabertooth1980 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Actually... We figured this one out too.
kilohurts (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
He is defies the evolution theory!!!

God is great!!! :D
OwnedByScience (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Macro evolution is accumulated micro evolution, not the other way around.
willieboy561 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I have read some incredibly stupid comments here. I will say this though. Neither side has proved ANYTHING.
andvil01 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The whole system DO NOT have to be formed in one step. A beetle that taste bad survives better. Only one of the components is better than nothing. If it only release when necessary it saves energy. Another bad smelling component even better. A weak concentration enzymes produces less heat. With more heat resistant tissue the higher concentration.

Once again the ID fails!
betterMatt2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Actually, you need to work on correct grammar, and usage: instead of "The whole system DO NOT..." you should have put: The whole system DOES NOT...

And instead of: A beetle that taste bad survives better. You should have put: A beetle that tastes bad, is more likely to survive. And, the next sentence adds to the confusion: "If it only release when necessary it saves energy." It should be: If it only releaseS... And, releases what?
erotylid (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Thousands of years in an evolutionary context is nothing. It requires much more time--hundreds of thousands to millions of years. The fact is, the reason you and I get the flu bug each year is because of evolution. The reason we are not able to wipe out HIV is evolution (microevolution). The viruses are evolving. If you are interested in evidence or an example of something that is evolving rapidly, into new species, there you have it.
SoLoLaamer (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
some aren't being intellectually honest here. If we are tinkering with genetics, what makes you put out the possibility that we could have been designed by someone that has knowledge in genetics,are we that arrogant to believe nothing existed before man discovered it?
brehndan (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
thats funny, i look down at the first post i see and the guy was talkin about just what i was 2 seconds before on the phone, i agree, i believe in god, but there probably are many beings below most high, many different versions of us many life forms, think star systems being around billions of years b4 ours, sphere, symmetry, duality? singularity! language symbology, geometrical mathematical designs for your mind, stay reclined!
tomaselvis (7 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
"the mathematical chance of even the most basic of digestive enzymes of evolving is, wait for it..."

So, what do think of the new research in England? Parts of RNA assembles itself(!) with only simple chemicals.

And you say it's impossible...

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.