Reactionless propulsion ? Anti gravity ? 『 Thrust generator USNFM-500 』

★USNFM-500 This is not mere theory, is the device that actually works. (Which is an experiment on the ground) It is a working machine has already been proven in the test.
★USNFM-500 it is The universe is a device for obtaining a driving force
This model is a single gyro, and a double inversion and increase the thrust of the multi-aim to stabilize the aircraft.
Source of power is anything OK.
"space bike" thing might be possible, such as.
The shape of the rotor is more efficient is good shape, but may be （picture 1997）
★Makes three lines crossing the space, as an image, " + " I feel that underlie the third straight back from the center of the front. Each side: x, vertical: y, th line 3: z and. rotate in the same direction as the x-axis rotation axis, the two gyro be paired revolution as the revolution axis and y axis, 3 z th line acts as a moment to try to orbital axis orbital axis . At this rate But, each gyro one 2 z moment acting on the axis is canceled out each other, plus or minus = 0, the shape of the gyro, "disk-shaped solid" as long as it is used as a driving force that is It is impossible. Videos like the shape of the gyro, however, "cylinder" By that, it becomes possible to use as a driving force...
★Is this a Reactionless propulsion ?
★USNFM-500 とは、机上の空論では、有りません。(地上での実験ですが、）実験にて実証された、実際に動作する推進機です。
★USNFM-500 とは、宇宙空間において、推力を得る為の装置です。このモデルは、シングルジャイロですが、二重反転＆マルチ化により推力を増強及び、機体­の安定化を図ります。動力源は­人力、その他なんでもOK 。宇宙自転車なんて物が出来そうですね。　回転子の形状については、もっと効率がいい形状が、あるのかもしれません・・・（撮影1997）
★空間に3本の直線を交差させます、イメージとしては、" ＋ " の中心に手前から奥に3本目の直線が貫く感じです。それぞれ、横：ｘ、縦：ｙ、3本目の直線：ｚとします。　x軸を回転軸として同じ方向に回転する、対になった2つのジャイロを　ｙ軸を公転軸として公転させると、　3本目の直線ｚ軸を公転軸として公転させようとするモーメントが作用します。　ですがこのままでは、２つのジャイロそれぞれのｚ軸に作用するモーメントは互いに打ち消し合い、プラスマイナス＝０となり、ジャイロの形状が " ソリッドな円盤状 " である限り、それを推進力として利用する事は不可能です。 ところがジャイロの形状を動画の様に " 円筒体 " にする事により、推進力として利用する事が可能となります。
★もしかして無反動推進ですか・・・？

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Anti
• gravity
• Thrust
• 推力
• 無重力
• UFO
• 反重力
• ジャイロ
• 無反動推進
• Reactionless
• propulsion

[JaycubL]

I sympathize with your search for inertial propulsion, but this is deffinately an aerodynamic propulsion thing. The rotating cans are interacting with the boundary layer of air and producing lift the same way as a ball thrown with "backspin" does.

[wii810772]

@JaycubL

thanks !

[TheAsatot]

Gyro precession is not antigravity.

[wii810772]

Thank you.



[TheAsatot]

@TheAsatot P.S. can't get even half of the description due to lack of knowlege of technical English language. My native is Russian.

[wii810772]

@TheAsatot sorry My native is japanese.



[repatte]

Appears to be angular, thus is not propulsive. If it did gain any linear momentum with no angular loss then it is violating conservation laws. Effectively a free energy machine.

[TheAsatot]

@wii810772 I'll put you thumb up for the construction, but may be i don't get the scheme? What's with those cylinders? Are they precessing too? A picture with the forces vectors could really help.

[wii810772]

thanks !

[WARPUNK]

no demostrates antigraviti in this video