Did Paul McCartney of THE BEATLES Really Die in 1966?

THE ROTTEN APPLE series by IAMAPHONEY:
http://www.youtube.com/user/iamaphoney

Matt's other videos on this subject:

The HAPPY SHOW! Beatles PAUL IS DEAD legend!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL6nUwCgPaM

Matt Examines Some Clues To THE BEATLES Paul Is Dead Hoax!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK3wA6SON-s

Matthew Hawes
http://www.thehappyshow.net

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Matt
• Hawes
• matthawes
• The
• Beatles
• PID
• Paul
• is
• dead
• hoax
• legend
• iamaphoney
• rotten
• apple
• clues
• Faul
• William
• Shepard
• Billy

[boobah1067]

Hi. 2 serious Italian forensic scientists concluded (&wrote book): careful multiple photo head analysis shows key skull, bone areas, palate, ear do NOT match between the 2 time periods, but DO match within - pre, post 1966. Article in Wired (Italy) Aug 2009 posted w translation: plasticmacca .blogspot com/2010/01/forensic-science-p­roves-paul-was html They explain that every key area of comparison doesnt match, wrote a book (Italian). Then demur emotionally to say hard 2 believe it so maybe not.

[MattHawes]

@boobah1067, what is the name of this book the forensic scientists wrote, and where can I find it for sale?

[mattlaureys]

watch the winged beatle it's a movie on youtube that explains all the clues

[MattHawes]

@mattlaureys, Hi! I've watched that and many of Imaphoney's other videos. While I find his videos entertaining, i don't subscribe to his theories about the clues. Thanks.

[arbonac]

Watch the documentary

[MattHawes]

@arbonac, Which one? The "Paul McCartney is Really Dead" documentary, with the very obvious (to a fan) fake George Harrison voice, and factual errors? That doc is entertaining, and as a Beatles fan I do own it, but it's hardy reliable. I did create my own documentary, "Cranberry Sauce," which deals with the facts as they were reported in media and interviews, particularly during the year 1969, when the whole rumor first broke out into the mainstream. Thanks for commenting.

[dvallen1]

Paul may have been a victim of a kidnapping by a radical group in retaliation to John's "I'm bigger than Jesus " comment. Eipstien too. Look at the spirit of the music...from "I'm a Loser" to" So Sgt. Pepper took you by surprise"...the inspiration was different after '66. It became serious, somber,and even morbid. It had been lighthearted. Scout around....see "The winged Beetle" and "Paul Really is Dead" It's all compelling. God loves a bucolic you see.

[pogtc12]

same the paul is dead hoax made me more of a fan before i knew about it i would of never of heard the album magical mystry tour (in my view is there best) i also dont bealve in it but in intrest me i also to think it was for marketing. if it is true then his repasment is alot better

[boobah1067]

@MattHawes Turns out the article I just sent link to is detailed summary in better English but actual translation albeit by bad Google translator, is only avail at Plastic Macca. So now you have enough to know thier analysis is quite valid.Comments here rgarypatterson com /my_review_of_the_new__paul_is­_dead__evidence_23917 htm suggest photoanalysis is impossible! & Ignore wildly different dental issues. Also deflect onto other mistakes of blogs not this material thus argue a straw man.

[boobah1067]

@MattHawes Found good transl article. erichufschmid net/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCart­ney-Italian html Missing pre-66 comp to 2nd pre-66, but is at plasticmacca since whole article in Italian=there. Note: some have disparaged photoanalysis but unaware of specific ways the comps were done: a curve of jaw, for ex, doesnt mean you see a curve but rather start-stop of relative proportion of basic width to basic height of an area which doesnt change significtly over time. Also dental ignored in debunk.

[boobah1067]

Avail4 sale at many Ital. on-line bookstores. 1with nice blurb rockol.it /libri-725/Fabio-Andriola-e-Al­essandra-Gigante-Il-Codice-McC­artney but u cldve looked on Scroogle Scraper (or if u r silly, on Google spy itself). Do pls let me know if u find any1 willing 2 buy it, copy, or transl. I have no $. NE way, point is, the work HAS been done. If small errors here & there=insignif.: Macca is so off, hes a new band member. But I knew that: am artist & hes very diff. Some attitudes similar though.

[boobah1067]

@MattHawes Hi. You have not gone to the link I sent or youd have seen the only English version (Google Translate) of their work in any form. The article explains the gist of the work (if you take the time to think about it), I believe. Only part of their work is given in the article but its enough; they compd pre, post & combined. ALL KEY AREAS wrong, some by a lot & explain why impossbl; Fabio Andriola & Alessandra Gigante. Book is in Italian, called: Codice McCartney, La verita sulla morte.

[boobah1067]

@boobah1067 I mean they demur and realize they shouldnt but cant face it fully so they say maybe not. I dont mean Im saying maybe not. They explain exactly why, how the science works, what methods work and what dont and so on.

[boobah1067]

@MattHawes Yes. That one is disinfo.