I Know Someone Who Defended Creationism Honestly

It can Happen, it's called Ignorance and disbelief.

The videos I'm talking about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xihrXsVG0JI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO_8on3BTe0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxAiD-RJKFU

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Aronra
• honesty
• dishonest
• challenge
• creationism
• creation
• answer
• rationalization
• Biology
• evolution
• wrong
• truth
• absolute
• Darwin
• lie
• liar
• Aron
• ra
• response
• error
• atheist
• atheism

[JustAnotherMutant]

Please notice that potholer54 has canceled nominations when people have admitted that they were ignorant of the subject, or that they were incorrect on the subject.

[ThePuppyTurtle]

@JustAnotherMutant But most honest people won't, as they won't know they were wrong.

[AronRa]

Cite wherever you heard me make this challenge and pay attention to the clarifying conditions. Being unable to defend creationism honestly doesn't mean that you have to lie. You can either present a defense that is legitimately true, or you you can lie about it. If you don't lie, then you'll have the burden of having to produce something in defense of your position which is actually true. Creationism has no points like that, so it is not possible to defend it honestly.

[AronRa]

@DiscipleTube1 As I said, check where I originally made my challenge. I clarified the conditions then, and I stand by them now. Finding out that you were wrong -and accepting that- does mean that you did not lie, but how does that count as defending creationism? That would be failing to defend creationism.

[lessevdoolbretsim]

Did you get that microphone out of a Crackerjacks box?

[wyattnolte]

Step 3: Make untold numbers of ridiculous youTube videos stating said ignorant opinion. Step 4: Ignore all information contrary to your position. Step 5: Be a humungeous ingnoramus. Step 6: die and no-one cares

[wyattnolte]

lawlz, please dude, just accept evolution and continue your mindless drifting through life as a retard, unaware of the facts stacked against you by serious, dedicated and methodical scientists. Avoid truth at all costs and defend "creationism" against all professional objections. It works well for me as a flat earther as such. Step 1: Ignore all scientific evidence to the contrary. Step 2: Align yourself to scientific nobodys.

[ThePuppyTurtle]

@pat5168 I Responded to that video in Creatards say the darnedest things 11

[pat5168]

@AronRa If you want to see for yourself how ironic his accusations were here's the link of the Panspermia Article: journalofcosmology(DOT)comSear­chForLife(SLASH)125(DOT)html And the video is called "Why doesn't anyone question Thunderf00t? (Part 1). If you want a good laugh watch the video first and then see what the article actually says, and then maybe see his 3 part series on yourself. 

[pat5168]

@AronRa In fact I sent Equestions a message demonstrating why his source was dishonest and how one could only come to his conclusion if he only read the one sentence he highlighted and chose to ignore the rest, I said that it was dishonest on his part and misleading to the viewers so he should take it down, I haven't gotten a response back.

[pat5168]

@AronRa Another creationist under the guise of an intellectually sounding review of you and Thunderf00t's videos has also reached me, one of them was a dedicated 10 minute video of a misleading graph for Atheist statistics, but I stopped looking into his videos when I looked up a link he used as a "Peer reviewed scientific article supporting a global flood" but what it was was a Panspermia article on marine organisms reaching the moon, it in fact went into detail of why god was no explanation.

[pat5168]

@AronRa I do agree on his insignificance, when I heard that someone denied evolution on scientific terms, that sparked my interest, but I lost it once I saw the content of his videos, and when I read his website. The only thing that seems to make him believable to creationists is his rhetorical skills and uninformed YouTube commentators who don't know what they're talking about yet seem to be representing his perspective of all of the evidence for evolution.

[AronRa]

@pat5168 The challenge was for creationists to nominate someone representative of their beliefs and encourage that person to debate me. But thus far they have not found any champion which any group of them would agree upon or endorse. Even if it did, the debate still wouldn't happen because I won't permit anyone to profit financially from our confrontation.

[AronRa]

@pat5168 To the best of my memory, apart from the many incarnations of Andy the taxi driver, I have not blocked anyone in years. Neither have I ever debated this Steve Bee, or I would have a record of that debate in public archives. He is a forgettable troll trying to make himself seem significant enough to be memorable.