Sorry John but this is what I found on Companies House. United Kingdom Corporation Ltd are at Sharon Court and run by an Iranian and an Indian and are in the clothes Import/Export business as which has now ceased trading. Its a glaring inconsistancy in your presentation and needs to be corrected. You may find Dunn & Bradstreet list 'Members of Parliament' (which is not 'House of Commons/Lords'), Metropolitan Police, Ministry of Justice etc as Corporation because its American based and regardless of how it looks they need to put them into a category for business creditworthiness not because we area Governed by a company. i.e. I need to check if Hackney Council are broke and will pay my bills because they have low Council Tax receipts or its been capped etc.
I could be wrong and as you say 'Dont take my word for it' and I didnt ;-)
@herbertwarmstrong do you really think that the governing families like the Rothchilds and Windsor's are going to leave a trail...these use other puppets for that.... hence the names of others
CoolCollectableToys 3 months ago
@herbertwarmstrong By 'pakis' I assume you mean from Pakistan? Well what he actually said was Iran and India dimlow. They are two different countries, go back to school.
ozmonster1989 5 months ago
What your saying is the UK is in the hands of two Pakis? Somehow I doubt the Rothschilds and Rockefellers will allow them anywhere near it. The UK is probably a corporation but not in the hands of two pakis.
herbertwarmstrong 11 months ago
YOU ARE A HORSE'S ASS. NEXT TIME, ROTATE YOUR VIDEO SCREEN BEFORE SUBJECTING US TO YOUR HORRID IDEAS OF READING ORIENTATION. YOU CAN GO BACK TO MASTURBATING NOW, YOU BIG JERK-OFF.
scabbybuttcrack 1 year ago
@artsychic2000 have you tried it ? because there are several people who have and nobody has proven them to be fake. lots of success stories. so i cant just take your word for it.
FREEGARYMCKINNON 1 year ago
@FREEGARYMCKINNON
no...it only works for them because they own the government and the courts. It will never work for you
artsychic2000 1 year ago
@artsychic2000 yes the signature is a powerful tool. in blue ink. thats what creates the money or the loan.
there is a method of payment called accepted for value that you can look up that relates to this. it is a method of paying off debts/loans.
names like winston shrout , tim turner, creditors in commerce, sam davis
these guys have videos about it if your interested.
FREEGARYMCKINNON 1 year ago
couldn't you have fixed that so we could have read it right?
artsychic2000 1 year ago
My husband...against my non-legal advise took out a loan to pay off another loan...
He has the home and two vehicles. The only thing of any value is the home which they own anyway and always will. He was told that the loan would be based solely on his signature as though he has no assets. What does that mean? His labor is the only asset. What if he can't work? Can you say labor camp?
artsychic2000 1 year ago