i have one, but only shot vids indoors at low light. outdoors it looks really nice and clean for a $200 camera (based on your vid). clean, bright, crisp, though it seems focus isn't dead-stable esp near the end when you blow dust off the lens.
@manuel713 Mind you if your not super worried, then its not a negative. 4mm isnt too much to worry about anyways. But the SD750 had a 35mm wide lens (i think?). So for you just going from that to the 28mm must be a big change. Now you can get and have to get alot closer. I rather get closer vs use the zoom. You Aperture will not let you stay at 2.8. And in cases of night shots, you will notice when you zoom it will get darker. This is why. Its a learning curve lol, a steep one. GL
@manuel713 - Sometimes i have a hard time explaining things. When you go fully wide (no zoom), how much of the picture you see on the screen is how wide the lens is. 28mm has a narrower coverage than 24.
If you had a 35mm, 28mm, 24mm lens, all took the same shot of the same object, from the same distance. starting with the 35mm, it would give you the picture. The 28mm would show it further away and wider, 24mm even more so. Wide angle lenses help best in tight or odd areas too.
@MRm3dia what is the difference between the 24mm on the 300 and the 28mm on the 310? I got this cam to upgrade from my old SD750. I liked the bigger screen, Image stablizer.. and becasuse it was canon.. lol
@manuel713 Also you gave up a 24mm wide angle lens for a 28mm one. So thats sort of a negative, but your still digic5, so thats a plus. I just realized to my dismay for you (unless you don't care regardless lol) but other than that you payed more for nearly the same thing thats quite a bit cheaper price wise atm.
@manuel713 - Its the same audio i believe as the 300, & has the same issue with sound zooming in loud conditions.
it would of been cool to get Digic 5, like you. I only got my 300hs since last years S95 still was expensive, even though the new S95 with digic 5 was nearly out. Mainly a cost issue.
I got my Canon 300HS 2 months ago. Was regularly $229 (with canon carrying case). I was able to snag it for about $179canadian, and the guy tossed in a good Sony 8gig class 4 sd card free.
what sd card are you using with this camera ?
mmw21111 3 weeks ago
i have this camera but the battery is so not good and no body is complaining about that.
but at least you can buy an extra battery> but i recommend it
rating> *8/10
have a nice life ;)
AWR10010 1 month ago
@HemiJeep19Updates I have this camera, yet when I use the 1920 for my videos, it doesn't seem to wanna edit... any ideas?
KayLaTiDo 1 month ago
i have one, but only shot vids indoors at low light. outdoors it looks really nice and clean for a $200 camera (based on your vid). clean, bright, crisp, though it seems focus isn't dead-stable esp near the end when you blow dust off the lens.
bluepowder7 1 month ago
@manuel713 Mind you if your not super worried, then its not a negative. 4mm isnt too much to worry about anyways. But the SD750 had a 35mm wide lens (i think?). So for you just going from that to the 28mm must be a big change. Now you can get and have to get alot closer. I rather get closer vs use the zoom. You Aperture will not let you stay at 2.8. And in cases of night shots, you will notice when you zoom it will get darker. This is why. Its a learning curve lol, a steep one. GL
MRm3dia 1 month ago
@manuel713 - Sometimes i have a hard time explaining things. When you go fully wide (no zoom), how much of the picture you see on the screen is how wide the lens is. 28mm has a narrower coverage than 24.
If you had a 35mm, 28mm, 24mm lens, all took the same shot of the same object, from the same distance. starting with the 35mm, it would give you the picture. The 28mm would show it further away and wider, 24mm even more so. Wide angle lenses help best in tight or odd areas too.
MRm3dia 1 month ago
@MRm3dia what is the difference between the 24mm on the 300 and the 28mm on the 310? I got this cam to upgrade from my old SD750. I liked the bigger screen, Image stablizer.. and becasuse it was canon.. lol
manuel713 1 month ago
@manuel713 Also you gave up a 24mm wide angle lens for a 28mm one. So thats sort of a negative, but your still digic5, so thats a plus. I just realized to my dismay for you (unless you don't care regardless lol) but other than that you payed more for nearly the same thing thats quite a bit cheaper price wise atm.
MRm3dia 1 month ago
@manuel713 - sorry i mean this years S100 (s95 was past year)
MRm3dia 1 month ago
@manuel713 - Its the same audio i believe as the 300, & has the same issue with sound zooming in loud conditions.
it would of been cool to get Digic 5, like you. I only got my 300hs since last years S95 still was expensive, even though the new S95 with digic 5 was nearly out. Mainly a cost issue.
I got my Canon 300HS 2 months ago. Was regularly $229 (with canon carrying case). I was able to snag it for about $179canadian, and the guy tossed in a good Sony 8gig class 4 sd card free.
MRm3dia 1 month ago