30 Battlecruisers vs 30 Carriers
Top Comments
All Comments (1,035)
-
@deSolAxe dont forget you also notice that the battlecruisers arent upgraded at all when they upgrading the careers on the first tier, its not much, but its an edge
-
@Gr33dy77 haha so true
-
good ole sc1 days when carriers were actually the legit protoss iconic unit... they were suppose to be strong, it was a protoss icon... now its more shit, and they removing it from heart of the swarm, bs :/
-
@deSolAxe also you need to stack together for this to apply, the bc fleet can be divided in 2 to sorround the carriers
-
@deSolAxe nah yamato cannon quickly reduces you to 15 carriers with good micro, if you apply that strategy (which also needs intense micro), 30 battlecruisers can quickly decimate all your interceptors with no major loss
-
@deSolAxe thats just bad strategy. he should go back to playing black ops.
-
Breaking Benjamin sucks Dick
-
if you look closely, carriers had 111 upgrades also, and battlecruisers had none
-
I think its safe to say, which ever unit was focusing firing / micro'd would have won
-
@atomicf4rt How the fuck can you like SC2 but not SC1? Starcraft helped start the legacy Blizzard has today.
yes the good old sc1 days...... when carriers looked like flying potatoes
Gr33dy77 1 month ago 25
you can see how skill is important here...
if the one controlling carriers made them stick together and slowly retreat so they'd be just outside BC's range while interceptors still continued to attack, he might have won... also using all of them to attack 1 BC at a time might have been good idea...
deSolAxe 3 months ago 9