Eleccion Papa Pio XII
Top Comments
All Comments (50)
-
Also if the current Church is Masonic then why does she constantly defend the Apostolic Tradition of issues such as contraception, abortion, euthanasia, homosexuality, priestesses, and clerical celibacy. If u ask me the world wants these things so the Church would not hav much to lose in allowing them in terms of temporal authority. But the Church does not allow them. Instead she constantly defends the Apostolic Tradition. That doesn't seem like something that power hungry Masons would do.
-
When I say this I mean one that defies Divine Tradition that has been there since the beginning of the Church, not a human tradition that is not infallible. As per ur Siri thesis, I would ask where is ur proof of this. If u hav none then does it seem wise to u to follow a conspiracy theory, as opposed to a Roman Pontiff who is in front of u.
-
Vatican II did not change the Catholic Faith, it offered no new dogmatic statements. However it did change Church strategy in evangelizing the modern world, because clearly the modern mind is different from the minds of old. Thus said it seems clear that a change in strategy was needed. Vatican II did not proclaim any heresy, I would challenge u to find one.
-
The Mass of Paul VI came after Vatican II. But the Mass of Paul VI does not have anything initial that would make it invalid. It gets rid of a number of ceremonials yes, but this does not make the mass invalid. Human traditions are gone but the necessary Divine Tradition remains. Effectively if u wish to hold onto such human traditions and make them equal to Divine Tradition u r guilty of the Sin of the Pharisees.
-
We should also remember that the Eastern Rites are also valid. Now it remains in the authority of the Supreme Pontiff to change the Order of the Mass because he has supreme canonical authority over such rites. That being said, Vatican II, an ecumenical council, also had such authority. However it is important to remember that the only actual change that was made to the mass at Vatican II was the permission to use the vernacular if there was a suitable amount of faithful requesting it.
-
I find it interesting what a number of u r saying. However I think there are some clear flaws in ur argument. First of all the Tridentine mass is not the only valid rite. St. Pius V would agree with me because he allowed the continued existence of other non-Roman rites within the Latin Church, not to mention the fact that all the Pre-Tridentine Roman rites must also have been valid or else u must admit that the Church of Rome didn't hav a valid Mass for 1500 years.
-
@MrMiguelE from 1958 until 1989 it was Siri. Then, we don't know. The Catholic hierarchy is in exile and must operate in secret, because it's enemies want to kill them all. The Vatican and most of her heretical bishops and priests will be destroyed, Rome will be destroyed, the Hierarchy will flee, only after those events we will know the real Pope. A short but terrible time is coming.
-
@rooizilver so there were really 2 popes for 31 years!
Viva il Papa Pius XII! The Pope of the great Encyclical Mysticis Corporis!Truly a great Roman Pope!Eternal be his Memory.He was aSaint!He proclaimed the Dogma of the Assumtion of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Jame243 4 years ago 16
Papa meraviglioso e santo
otikiki 3 years ago 4