Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Global Warming: How Hot Air and Bad Science Will Give YOU Staggeringly Higher Taxes and Prices

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,499
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 25, 2008

Barack Obama has pledged to "skyrocket electric rates," bankrupt the coal industry and make YOU pay staggeringly higher costs for the energy, food and products you need to live. What's really behind the "green revolution?" Is there in fact climate change or global warming? Is Al Gore's movie "Inconvenient Truth" truth or propaganda? Are global temperatures actually increasing or decreasing?

Former investigative reporter and current advisor for Senator Jim Inhofe, Marc Morano reveals the agenda behind the hype. He discusses the complicated "cap and trade" (more truthfully known as "Cap and Tax") scheme that Obama supports, actually a stealth 'carbon tax' which will cost Americans trillions have no effect on the climate. Even the Washington Post called Cap and Trade a "fundamental restructuring of our economy" which would do nothing for the climate.

They discuss how China is the greatest polluter in the world, and that there will be a net INCREASE in emissions as even more companies flee restrictive US laws and sky-high energy costs to go to China, India and the 3rd world. There are no limits on pollution in those countries and they are all exempt from the Kyoto accord. They also discuss the political indoctrination of youth on extreme exagerations on global warming. Mr. Morano discusses historic non-human-caused temperature cycles, how polar bear populations are actually increasing, totalitarian government control of your energy use, and how the EPA has declared CO2 as a pollutant (in violation of the Constitution); and much more. Václav Klaus has declared radical environmetalism as the worst threat to freedom--worse than Communism.

Watch and find out what the facts are, and how Obama's radical energy agenda may affect your family's cost of living.

Get more information at website of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and sign up for their email list: http://www.epw.senate.gov

This is an edition of Conservative Roundtable, the nationally broadcast conservative television program hosted by Howard Phillips, and created and produced by Art Harman and The Conservative Caucus.

Please visit our websites:
http://www.ConservativeUSA.org
http://www.HowardPhillips.com
http://www.NAUWarRoom.org

Our YouTube channel is TCCTV -- Invite your friends to visit for our latest videos!

  • likes, 26 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TCCTV)

  • Perhaps the greatest contributor to increased CO2 and pollution of all types is WTO and NAFTA. American and foreign companies moved their factories to China, Mexico and the 3rd world where there are no pollution laws, bypassing decades of American laws to protect the environment. China is now the worst CO2 and pollution source in the world.

    Buy American made products--that will help cut pollution!

  • I'm an American in South Korea right now. The pollution in China is no joke. It affects life over here. You have to use umbrellas because it's been proven that the rain will thin your hair. Dust from dry Chinese seasons blows over here in the winter and you need to wear masks.

  • Exactly right, China is the greatest polluter & greenhouse gas producer in the world. "Cap and Trade" will just send more US manufacturing to China where there are no pollution controls.

Top Comments

  • great vid..great title..thanks for the link!

  • New Tax in the works, Barack Obama has promised to support carbon-trading scams based on phony global warming statistics. Brace for a short ice age 2045.

    He embraces junk science, green profiteering. I've current graphs from the real scientific community. The planet is actually cooling down-CO2 levels have risen slightly and the ten year troposphere global temp has decreased.

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @NookulerFreedom Looks like he was right.

  • im afraid

  • i disagree. there is nothing wrong with any co2 going into the atmosphere. co2 is what we exhale. plants need it to survive and thrive. the more co2 we have, the more crops we can grow. the notion that co2 is a bad thing is just ludicrous and ridiculous.

  • You are right. The USA invented the concept of environmental protection, far before Europe. We have dramatically cleaned up our pollution. It is totally unlimited pollution and greenhouse gasses from China and the 3rd world that is where international attention should be placed.

  • "Many of us in the science community consider Global Cooling to be the biggest threat to humanity Considering the lack of activity and Sunspots occurring at the same time Global Warming seems to be over..."

    Get those coats to the cleaner...speaking of being taken to the cleaner!

    hehehe

  • That's already been done, in large part. The Clean Air Act, as amended. has brought us cleaner air than we had 100 years ago, when we burned mostly wood and were only transitioning to coal. The transition to oil and gas reduced our emissions further, and the technological changes mandated by the CAA have reduced combustion emissions to essentially CO2 and H2O. There are hot spots like LA, but dirt cores show that the air was dirty in the valleys of CA centuries ago, when the population was tiny

  • "Decaying plants contributes to the largest bulk of earth c02"

    Probably not true. Terrestrial biotic sources are also dwarfed by pelagic biotic sources. Terrestrial and pelagic biotic sources together completely swamp out all human contributions by at least two orders of magnitude, probably more. This leaves out the non-biotic sources, also quite large. But recent CO2 increase are almost entirely natural; only a tiny fraction of the CO2 in our present atmosphere is sourced from fossil fuels.

  • that does not account for a "wobble." only a substantial such thing would be of concern. but i've never heard of such a scientifically proven study- that the earth wobbles. if you can site one with an accredited peer review, I would like to read it.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more