PRO-LIFE OR IS IT?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
745 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Oct 29, 2008

Biblical analysis of some points the pro-life movement advocates
It would appear as if the pro-life movement is a take all or nothing kind of thing, and this dead lock would only be broke if the issue is disentangled, to allow people to find their degree of support for it

So a valid question could be, is the pro-life title correctly applied to the movement?, at lease its opponents agree the title is wrong since the movement does not encompasses, the protection of human life in general, including the abolition of death penalty, witch by the way is tackled by most pro-choice, persons along many times, with animal cruelty, and sport killing, overall, pro-choice advocates, appear to have a more scholar way to present their case, as opposed to pro-life advocates who appear to rely more in religious doctrines for their fundament, and such basis can be analyzed, to provide room for discussion, from a pro-choice point of view, which ultimately could be described as the real pro-life view.

Premise 1- children and the unborn are not accountable for sin, (Ezekiel 18:18-20)because they have no conscience, until a certain age they have an innocent mind, the problem is, no one remains a child, & therefore we all are destine to die sooner or later going first through the SLEP IN DUST STAGE(Mathew9:24,John11:11-12,Job19:26) then resurrect to final death by fire, the only ones that will inherit the eternal life, are the children who did not made it past their innocent stage, & the unborn, plus few grown ups that managed to be innocent like children.(Luke 18:17)

Premise 2- pro-life advocates commonly take the stance of opposing birth control, which does not reflect one of their core beliefs which says that the great majority will be lost ( Mathew 7:14).leaving only one option, abstinence, which is good, but not enough on its own, to diminish unwanted pregnancies.

Premise 3- once the children is born from unwanted pregnancies, the pro-life crowd abandon this once fetuses to their own luck cutting social programs that would enhance their chances to succeed in life all with the excuse of government butting off from peoples lives, forgetting they were butting in before, though, for political reasons.

Premise 4- when face with the choice of saving a baby or an (egg-seed ) embryo, pro-life advocates would rather save the egg, even when eventually discarded with out a purpose, use less as the scripture points out, a seed alone is worthless, but if it dies it will produce many more.(Mathew 12:24)

Premise 5- not always the people was invaluable, in fact the bible, contains a scale of material values, being more valuable a grown up person than a month old baby who was valued from 3 to 5 silver coins, while an adult ranged from 10 to 20 silver coins, babies 1 month old & less were not assigned value.(Leviticus 27:1-8)

Premise 6- whats impossible with man, it is possible with God, a common stone can be an embryo, an the unborn who had no chance to be born, can still be birthed from the rocks, should God desire to do so( Mathew 3:9)
The point is, no one who is innocent is really lost,
even if they were prevented from being born into the world.

John10:27My sheep listen to my voice. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. Revelation3:7...These are the words of him who is holy and true,. What he opens no one can shut, and what he shuts no one can open.


In synthesis:
suppose I was not a believer, the bible says it would have been better if I wasnt born, (Mathew 26:24)by reason of being a sinner so I wont have to die eternally for not repenting of my sins, but at least before I was born I was saved ( Ezekiel18:18-20 ), and this is the point where the bible crosses roads with the pro-choice issue, the bible is really telling us that we must be born again to be saved(John 3:3), so I would argue that it would have been better if some doctor had stopped my arriving into adulthood, because now I have to get born again, and dont sin no more, thats what turning into a child means(Mathew 24:48),

nevertheless it appears the sinner who repents has greater value, than a child who hasnt sinned yet(Leviticus27:1-8) because the adult, was bought with the blood of Jesus(1corinthians6:20)just need to acknowledge that he was bought , as opposed to the small children, who dont need to acknowledge it, because they are innocent., therefore they are guaranteed to inherit eternal life.




P.S.

This video is not to condone abortion, but rather and invitation to dialog

I believe that we as Christians should not let ourselves be used as political instruments, as we potentially can damage the cause of Christ, which is the saving of the Lost who are out there alive in the world field, but in risk of loosing their eternal life.

And remember, the original sin was taken away from babies, by Christ, in the Cross.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to What "PRO LIFE" Really Means
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it is an all or nothing thing. My rights and the rights of all women are all or nothing.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more