Ah! Great vid. I'm fully in agreance with the turbo electric concept. Much better BTU than batteries. Now I wish i can get a unit like this for my progects.....
Very impressive design, as we know, kerosene has a lot of BTUs per KG, and the turbine is also light weight. you should have range and 'hover on station' advantages over the electrics by a huge factor. Payload could be hefty too :-) Far more than toy potential. Thank you for sharing.People should read about Quad Rotor control before commenting on the shortcomings of your design..
@vdog1997 nothing is stable in ground effect.
superskullmaster 1 month ago
Not very stable, but really cool. Nice job!!!!
vdog1997 6 months ago
Quick question about the blades, What is the profile that you are using to carry such a load?
6JRT 11 months ago
Ah! Great vid. I'm fully in agreance with the turbo electric concept. Much better BTU than batteries. Now I wish i can get a unit like this for my progects.....
Paulchoppysoo 1 year ago
Very impressive design, as we know, kerosene has a lot of BTUs per KG, and the turbine is also light weight. you should have range and 'hover on station' advantages over the electrics by a huge factor. Payload could be hefty too :-) Far more than toy potential. Thank you for sharing.People should read about Quad Rotor control before commenting on the shortcomings of your design..
georgeutterpower 1 year ago
to loud, use electric its better
jukio02 1 year ago
@TiagoTiagoT
First I agree with this "did you pay him to ask him for his schematics on his work? get a life"
Second, don't you see the torsion rodes bellow each propeller chassis arm?
molinobeer 1 year ago
This is funny, can not imagine why someone would build it. And ohh, it would probably fly higher once you cut the ropes!;0)
chrstein 1 year ago
why a turboshaft-electric drive ?
is that really more efficient than all electric ?
shodanxx 1 year ago
@rodstartube i mean some simplified drawing of how it is done, not the classified master plans
TiagoTiagoT 1 year ago